2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic tomography in coupled discrete-continuum concept to image hydraulic properties of a fractured and karstified aquifer (Lez aquifer, France)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the present paper is the first to combine tracer and geophysical data to identify the discrete geometry of a karst network. Another conceivable approach would be the joint inversion of both types of data, but inversion methods based on a discrete approach to flow and/or transport paths are still at an early stage of development, e.g., Somogyvári et al, 2017 andFischer et al, 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, the present paper is the first to combine tracer and geophysical data to identify the discrete geometry of a karst network. Another conceivable approach would be the joint inversion of both types of data, but inversion methods based on a discrete approach to flow and/or transport paths are still at an early stage of development, e.g., Somogyvári et al, 2017 andFischer et al, 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or via the simulation (mimicking) of the action of speleogenetic processes considering pre-existing rock discontinuities (fractures, bedding planes, and inception horizons), e.g., Jaquet et al (2004), Borghi et al (2012) and De Rooij and Graham (2017). Other approaches strive to infer the spatial distribution of karst conduits through the inversion of multiple pumping test and/or tracer test data, also referred to as hydraulic or tracer tomography (Borghi et al, 2016;Mohammadi and Illman, 2019;Fischer et al, 2020). Regardless of the method pursued, any data describing the likely occurrence and location of karst conduits in the subsurface should be supplied to a given model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multicontinua and mobile‐immobile models (Al‐Rudaini et al., 2020; Goltz & Roberts, 1986; Lichtner & Karra, 2014) represent the next level of complexity to account for the presence of preferential flow paths in fractured rocks while staying within the Darcian framework. Hybrid discrete‐continuum models explicitly represent dominant fractures while representing smaller fractures as a continuum (Carrera & Martinez‐Landa, 2000; Fischer et al., 2020). Finally, discrete fracture network (DFN) models attempt to describe individual fractures and processes occurring in them in a manner akin to pore‐scale modeling (Dverstorp & Andersson, 1989; Fumagalli et al., 2019).…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification Multifidelity Models and Emulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the methods is the generation of plausible conduit networks either through analog templates (Pardo-Igúzquiza et al, 2012;Fournillon et al, 2012;Le Coz et al, 2017) or via the simulation (mimicking) of the action of speleogenetic processes considering pre-existing rock discontinuities (fractures, bedding planes, and inception horizons), e.g., Jaquet et al (2004), Borghi et al (2012), and de Rooij and Graham (2017). Other approaches strive to infer the spatial distribution of karst conduits through the inversion of multiple pumping test and/or tracer test data, also referred to as hydraulic or tracer tomography (Borghi et al, 2016;Mohammadi and Illman, 2019;Fischer et al, 2020). Regardless of the method pursued, any data describing the likely occurrence and location of karst conduits in the subsurface should be supplied to a given model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%