2004
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2004-0885.ch018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrocarbon C—H Bond Activation with Tp'Pt Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts the many reports of C−H elimination from mixed hydridoalkyl and aryl complexes, as will now be discussed. Parts of this chemistry have been recently reviewed 73 …”
Section: 2 Reactions At Tp Complexes Of Pt (Tp = Hydridotris(pyrazoly...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts the many reports of C−H elimination from mixed hydridoalkyl and aryl complexes, as will now be discussed. Parts of this chemistry have been recently reviewed 73 …”
Section: 2 Reactions At Tp Complexes Of Pt (Tp = Hydridotris(pyrazoly...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new methodology of installing functional groups on the aryl skeleton is greener, as it obviates the need for prefunctionalized substrates and, hence, the resulting waste during synthesis, yet presently suffers from several limitations. The more often encountered ones are the need for a directing group, which dictates the regiochemistry of the functionalization, and the use of catalysts derived from expensive second- or third-row late transition metals such as Pd, Pt, Ru, Rh, Ir, and Au . While new reports of C–H functionalization using late metals continue to emerge, growing concerns regarding their toxicity and cost-effectiveness have prompted interest in the use of cheap, benign, and readily available first-row metals such as Fe and Cu .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%