2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrocephalus and Bobble-Head Doll Syndrome

Abstract: Hydrocephalus and Bobble-Head Doll SyndromeA 4-month-old female child presented to a neurosurgeon for evaluation of macrocephaly and abnormal head movements. The mother's pregnancy had no complications or known perinatal infections. The parents were unrelated, and there was no family history of congenital anomalies. Ultrasonography performed at 14 and 24 weeks of gestation had revealed moderate hydrocephalus. The patient was born at 38 weeks of gestation by cesarean delivery, with a birth weight of 4100 g, a l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These movements are rhythmic, may intensify during stress, but are partially controllable by the patient and disappear during sleep [11]. At least 81 other cases have already been described before our cases [2,3,5,8,14,15,17,20] which have a particular clinical character due to the predominance of ‛‛non-non laterality movements''. Since the first description in 1966 [1], the consistency of intracerebral cystic abnormalities has been noticed but the direct causal link remains for the moment subject to controversies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These movements are rhythmic, may intensify during stress, but are partially controllable by the patient and disappear during sleep [11]. At least 81 other cases have already been described before our cases [2,3,5,8,14,15,17,20] which have a particular clinical character due to the predominance of ‛‛non-non laterality movements''. Since the first description in 1966 [1], the consistency of intracerebral cystic abnormalities has been noticed but the direct causal link remains for the moment subject to controversies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%