2019
DOI: 10.3390/w11051043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrochemical Properties of Groundwater Used for Korea Bottled Waters in Relation to Geology

Abstract: Bottled waters have been becoming increasingly popular in Korea over the last two decades due to the high demand for safe drinking water. Hydrochemical characterization of groundwater is essential for understanding quality properties of bottled waters. We investigated hydrochemistry of 60 manufacture factories for bottled waters in relation to geology. The mean EC value is highest in groundwaters of Ogcheon metamorphic rocks (213.6 μS/cm) > Precambrian gneiss (177.8 μS/cm) > Cretaceous granite (160.4 μS/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SiO 2 concentration in mainland Korea's groundwater ranged from 0.79-29.2 mg L −1 (average of 10.3 mg L −1 ), and the average SiO 2 concentration in Gangwon Province's groundwater was the lowest at 6.0 mg L −1 . These results were consistent with those previously reported, showing that the SiO 2 concentration in groundwater derived from volcanic rocks on Jeju Island was higher than that from granite, gneiss, and metamorphic rocks [2,13]. The silica concentration in groundwater in Argentina, which is similarly of volcanic pyroclastic origin, ranges from 19.6-72.9 mg L −1 , similar to the silica content in Jeju Island's groundwater [27].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Silica Concentration In Groundwater Betweesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The SiO 2 concentration in mainland Korea's groundwater ranged from 0.79-29.2 mg L −1 (average of 10.3 mg L −1 ), and the average SiO 2 concentration in Gangwon Province's groundwater was the lowest at 6.0 mg L −1 . These results were consistent with those previously reported, showing that the SiO 2 concentration in groundwater derived from volcanic rocks on Jeju Island was higher than that from granite, gneiss, and metamorphic rocks [2,13]. The silica concentration in groundwater in Argentina, which is similarly of volcanic pyroclastic origin, ranges from 19.6-72.9 mg L −1 , similar to the silica content in Jeju Island's groundwater [27].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Silica Concentration In Groundwater Betweesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The silica concentration in groundwater in Argentina, which is similarly of volcanic pyroclastic origin, ranges from 19.6-72.9 mg L −1 , similar to the silica content in Jeju Island's groundwater [27]. Weathering in quartz, amorphous silica, and aluminosilicate minerals may have an effect on the Si concentration in groundwater [2,9,16,27]. In general, extrusive rocks (e.g., basalt, andesite) have a lower total Si content but are weathered more quickly than intrusive rocks (e.g., granite) [27,37].…”
Section: Comparison Of the Silica Concentration In Groundwater Betweementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spring water hydrochemical facies, as well as relatively low mineralization, was in accordance with general characteristics of groundwater originating from magmatic and metamorphic rocks [53,54]. Mineralization was slightly higher than expected for pure silicate rocks (especially on K17), which is probably a consequence of the presence of carbonate minerals in the metamorphic rocks of the Jelenske vode area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…All δ 18 O and δ 2 H values are reported in the delta (δ) notation relative to the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW), where δ (% ) = (R sample /R standard − 1) × 1000 and R represents 18 O/ 16 O or 2 H/ 1 H, respectively. The δ 18 O and δ 2 H values were calibrated using three international standards, i.e., VSMOW2 (0% for δ 18 O and 0% for δ 2 H), Greenland ice sheet precipitation (−24.76% for δ 18 O and −189.5% for δ 2 H), and standard light Antarctic precipitation (−55.5% for δ 18 O and −427.5% for δ 2 H) as well as three laboratory standards (−5.21% , −8.57% , and −12.23% for δ 18 O and −46.08% , −56.86% , and −87.56% for δ 2 H).…”
Section: Physicochemical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%