2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroconversion kinetics of Marlim vacuum residue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almeida et al [17] presented a 5-lump kinetic model for hydroconversion of Marlim vacuum residue in which by utilizing fourteen experiments in batch reactor, 26 coefficients were estimated for the kinetic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Almeida et al [17] presented a 5-lump kinetic model for hydroconversion of Marlim vacuum residue in which by utilizing fourteen experiments in batch reactor, 26 coefficients were estimated for the kinetic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work confirmed the validity of lumping strategy even for the hydrotreating process. The usage of lumping strategy is not limited to hydrocracking and some works have been done in the similar fields like modeling of fluid catalytic cracking process [19], hydroconversion [20] and catalytic [21,22] as well as thermal cracking [23] of heavy oils which the latter is in the field of petrochemical processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Eqs. (9) to (15), ρ and μ are the density and viscosity of stream at hydrocracking pressure and temperature, respectively. These transport parameters can be calculated as follows [31]:…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of low Reynolds number of the stream (9<Re p <25), molecular diffusion is important. Therefore, the mass transport equation for lumps can be expressed as follows: (15) where j ranges from the fresh feed (F) to gas (G); C denotes the mass concentration of lumps; η is the effectiveness factor which is equal to 0.7 for a cylindrical catalyst in a trickle bed regime [29]; the positive sign "+" stands for reactant (feed or VGO); the negative sign "−" relates to products, and D j is the dispersion of lumps in the VGO feed whilst the self-diffusion and diffusion of gas in VGO are neglected. Therefore, D FF and D GF are equal to zero.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation