2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic analysis of an underwater glider wing using ANSYS fluent as an investigation tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17] Based on a nominal forward velocity Ṽ of the chosen reference UUV (see Section S1 and Figure S2, Supporting Information) of 0.25 m s À1 and on preliminary studies, an angle of attack (AoA) of α ¼ 12°m aximizes the efficiency of the chosen wing profile. [18] Since wings are mounted with α ¼ 0°with respect to the underwater gliders' longitudinal axis, the AoA of the vehicle coincides with that of the soft wing. To increase the generated lift L, and reduce the manufacturing complexity, an untapered wing design with no sweep, aspect ratio (AR) of 1.6, and chord length of 230 mm was chosen.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] Based on a nominal forward velocity Ṽ of the chosen reference UUV (see Section S1 and Figure S2, Supporting Information) of 0.25 m s À1 and on preliminary studies, an angle of attack (AoA) of α ¼ 12°m aximizes the efficiency of the chosen wing profile. [18] Since wings are mounted with α ¼ 0°with respect to the underwater gliders' longitudinal axis, the AoA of the vehicle coincides with that of the soft wing. To increase the generated lift L, and reduce the manufacturing complexity, an untapered wing design with no sweep, aspect ratio (AR) of 1.6, and chord length of 230 mm was chosen.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 17 ] Based on a nominal forward velocity Vfalse→$\overset{\rightarrow}{V}$ of the chosen reference UUV (see Section S1 and Figure S2, Supporting Information) of 0.25 m s −1 and on preliminary studies, an angle of attack (AoA) of α=12°$\alpha \left(= 12\right)^{\circ}$ maximizes the efficiency of the chosen wing profile. [ 18 ] Since wings are mounted with α=0°$\alpha \left(= 0\right)^{\circ}$ with respect to the underwater gliders’ longitudinal axis, the AoA of the vehicle coincides with that of the soft wing. To increase the generated lift Lfalse→$\overset{\rightarrow}{L}$, and reduce the manufacturing complexity, an untapered wing design with no sweep, aspect ratio (AR) of 1.6, and chord length of 230 mm was chosen.…”
Section: Design and Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, the effects of two different airfoil constructions on the gliding performance of gliders were compared based on numerical and experimental methods [8]. The optimal design parameters of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) airfoil were obtained by performing hydrodynamic analysis of the glider airfoil using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) [9]. Furthermore, the influence of NACA airfoil shape on the gliding economy and stability of UG was analyzed using hydrodynamic method [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%