2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.038102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic Attraction of Swimming Microorganisms by Surfaces

Abstract: Cells swimming in confined environments are attracted by surfaces. We measure the steady-state distribution of smooth-swimming bacteria (Escherichia coli) between two glass plates. In agreement with earlier studies, we find a strong increase of the cell concentration at the boundaries. We demonstrate theoretically that hydrodynamic interactions of the swimming cells with solid surfaces lead to their reorientation in the direction parallel to the surfaces, as well as their attraction by the closest wall. A mode… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

56
854
6
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 776 publications
(922 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
56
854
6
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been known for many years that swimming cells accumulate near surfaces. One of the prominent early observations was that of Rothschild (1963) who found this in the case of sperm cells, and more recent work on bacteria discovered a similar phenomenon (Berke et al 2008) and attributed the effect to long-range hydrodynamic interactions between the swimmers (viewed as pusher stresslets) and the no-slip wall. An opposing point of view advocated by Li & Tang (2009), but actually first mentioned by Rothschild (1963), is that the accumulation is associated with what has come to be called 'inelastic scattering' of cells by surfaces.…”
Section: Surface Interactions Of Microswimmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known for many years that swimming cells accumulate near surfaces. One of the prominent early observations was that of Rothschild (1963) who found this in the case of sperm cells, and more recent work on bacteria discovered a similar phenomenon (Berke et al 2008) and attributed the effect to long-range hydrodynamic interactions between the swimmers (viewed as pusher stresslets) and the no-slip wall. An opposing point of view advocated by Li & Tang (2009), but actually first mentioned by Rothschild (1963), is that the accumulation is associated with what has come to be called 'inelastic scattering' of cells by surfaces.…”
Section: Surface Interactions Of Microswimmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, any long-time-scale simulations have invariably had to terminate as the swimmer approached and descended into the boundary (as reported by Ramia et al 1993, for example). Apart from curving the trajectory, the boundary also seems to attract the swimmer (Berke et al 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For suspensions in a bounded domain, the swimming cells accumulate near the surface, as observed for bacteria (Li et al 2011) and up-swimming, bottom-heavy algae (Pedley & Kessler 1992), two different cellular organisms with opposite swimming modes, one 'pushing' the other 'pulling'. Several experimental and theoretical studies of swimming particle interactions with surfaces show that the particle interaction with the wall can vary with particle size, swimming type and particle shape and the long time trajectory of a swimming particle moving near a surface is not easily predicted (Li et al 2011;Berke et al 2008;Spagnolie & Lauga 2012;Zhu, Lauga & Brandt 2013). While most of these studies were conducted for solid walls, the motion toward a stress free surface, such as an air and water interface, show some similarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petri dishes, droplets, thin soap films, or films in glass slides (Berke et al 2008). In confined environments the swimming particle volume fraction φ can range from the semidilute to dense suspensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%