2009
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/149/1/012113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic bearing lubricated with magnetic fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1f]. So, beyond the third critical stress, 3 , the chain length is no more fixed but decreases progressively with increasing stress (or strain). We find that, at the same shear rate, the hydrodynamic force required to detach a chain from the wall is about four times the force required to destroy a free chain.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1f]. So, beyond the third critical stress, 3 , the chain length is no more fixed but decreases progressively with increasing stress (or strain). We find that, at the same shear rate, the hydrodynamic force required to detach a chain from the wall is about four times the force required to destroy a free chain.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the magnetic and mechanical properties of these fluids can be efficiently controlled by external magnetic fields and this makes them attractive for several industrial applications. Controlled stiffness dampers and magnetorheological finishing of optical surfaces have been successfully commercialized during the last decade and the other magnetorheological smart devices, such as controlled hydrodynamic bearings, are being developed [3]. The improvement of the real time control of these devices and the increase of the controllability range of their control parameters (flow rate, stiffness) are still important issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bo¨lter (1999), Guldbakke et al (2009), Guldbakke and Hesselbach (2006) and Abel-Keilhack (2002, 2003), a theoretical background was presented for this bearing concept, but no exact solution for calculating the load capacity of the bearing was provided. Similar work is done in Urreta et al (2009) that demonstrates the difference in using an FF and an MR fluid in a journal bearing. It showed that the internal pressure generated in an FF subjected to a magnetic field is not strong enough to be relevant for use as an active lubricant in most journal bearing applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…97 The main advantages of these bearings over conventional bearings were introduced, such as extremely low nonrepetitive run-out, good damping and quietness of operation, maintenance free service and high reliability. 90 Urreta et al 98 set up a test bench for plain journal bearings lubricated with FFs and magnetorheological fluids (MR). Theoretical analysis was carried out with numerical solutions of Reynolds equation, based on apparent viscosity modulation for FFs and Bingham model for MR.…”
Section: Bearing Lubrication Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%