Hydrodynamic Considerations for FLNG Concepts

The current demand in liquefied natural gas (LNG) from remote marine locations drives the design of floating LNG (FLNG) liquefaction or regasification facilities, where LNG is transferred to shuttle carriers (LNGC). During the loading procedure, which takes about 18–24 hours for a standard sized LNGC, free fluid surfaces and varying filling levels occur inside the internal cargo tanks. This condition is critical since the seakeeping behavior of the LNGC — especially the roll motion — is strongly influenced and varying. In order to estimate and forecast the LNGC motions, numerical methods based on potential theory are the most efficient and appropriate method. The selected approach is validated by model tests at 30% water filling height inside four prismatic tanks. In-depth analyses, including force and moment measurements between tanks and hull, revealed a discrepancy between the analytical natural modes of a prismatic tank and the resonance frequencies for four prismatic tanks mounted to a LNGC hull. This effect is caused by the ratio of rigid to added mass of the system as well as the fact that the tanks are mounted to a standard hull shape featuring a longitudinal bow-stern asymmetry. In order to investigate this phenomenon systematically, surface elevations inside the tanks and natural modes for a symmetric cuboid hull are compared to results for a standard LNGC hull, both with the same main dimensions. The influence of the tank positions is also considered by comparing the original (longitudinally asymmetric) LNGC tank positions on the cuboid hull to an exactly symmetric arrangement.

show abstract

Gap Effects at Side-by-Side LNG-Transfer Operations

Clauss

Dudek

Testa

2013

Volume 1: Offshore Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current demand of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from remote marine locations pushes the design of floating LNG (FLNG) liquefaction or regasification facilities, where LNG is transferred between shuttle carrier (LNGC) and terminal. Even if the tandem configuration is the primary choice for LNG transfer at rough offshore locations, side-by-side configurations would be the preferred option because of existing midship coupling manifolds on the present carrier fleet (no need for manifold modifications) as well as standard mooring systems and transfer-process-chains similar to oil-transfer. Therefore, the operation conditions at rough seas have to be improved to allow side-by-side LNG-transfer and to reduce offloading downtime. Within the SOTLL-project, side-by-side LNG transfer up to HS = 3 m is reached as a transfer limit using a new flexible pipe design, the advantages of sheltered areas at the leeside of the terminal barge and an optimized ship transfer position due to a flexible longitudinal offloading position. In addition to the evaluation of the hydrodynamic characteristics of this multibody system, one key aspect is the analysis of the exciting forces and motions due to wave amplification between the ships. In the gap between the hulls, the incoming wave field is amplified and changes dramatically. Depending on gap width, longitudinal offset, wave heading and length, large wave amplifications, standing waves and other resonance phenomena are observed which may result in high relative motions and increased forces of the entire mooring system. In this paper, the gap effects are investigated in detail with numerical approaches in frequency domain, validated by model tests at TU Berlin. A typical offloading scenario with barge and carrier is investigated for different gap sizes to identify suitable transfer configurations and ensure safe LNG offshore transfer up to HS = 3 m.

show abstract

Hydrodynamic Considerations for FLNG Concepts

Cited by 3 publications

References 14 publications

Coupling effects of barge motion and sloshing

Coupling effects of barge motion and sloshing

Sloshing: From Theory to Offshore Operations

Gap Effects at Side-by-Side LNG-Transfer Operations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About