2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.10.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic effects on mixing and competitive reactions in laboratory reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generated flow is expected to cause higher concentrations of the solution in the lower parts of the tank as compared to the upper regions. This observation clearly concurs with the experimental results performed in this work as well as conclusion of Akiti, and Bai [31], who earlier proved that the anchor impeller produces less flow and turbulence regardless of the configuration of the mixing vessel. The velocity streamlines of this impeller in (Figure 8), shows that the blades drove the fluid to the walls, which then splashed back and was directed vertically and in opposite directions toward the center of the tank.…”
Section: Cfd Post-process Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The generated flow is expected to cause higher concentrations of the solution in the lower parts of the tank as compared to the upper regions. This observation clearly concurs with the experimental results performed in this work as well as conclusion of Akiti, and Bai [31], who earlier proved that the anchor impeller produces less flow and turbulence regardless of the configuration of the mixing vessel. The velocity streamlines of this impeller in (Figure 8), shows that the blades drove the fluid to the walls, which then splashed back and was directed vertically and in opposite directions toward the center of the tank.…”
Section: Cfd Post-process Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Firstly, the vertical elements of the probe can act as small "baffles" in the rotating fluid, disrupting the smooth tangential flow generated by the impeller and producing an enhanced dissolution rate. This phenomenon is well known and amply described (35,36). Secondly, the presence of a single probe on only one side of the vessel introduces a small asymmetry in an otherwise symmetrical system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These include process optimization, process safety evaluation, scale-sensitivity understanding, and robustness testing [1]. Reaction kinetics and model-based reactor engineering are seldom adopted for the production of pharmaceutical ingredients, even though they can be quite advantageous for process design and engineering [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Let alone their economical favourability, which is even more valid for complex reaction networks [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suitable approach should firstly consist of the supposition of likely reaction mechanisms and choice of appropriate analytical techniques [4,5], followed by the process model construction [6] and its optimization for a given operation [7,8]. While it has been generally accepted that such an approach may also substantially reduce risks when performing the scale-up of process [9][10][11][12], the overall procedure from the underlying mechanisms to optimization is rather rare in API development. To a lesser extent, the particular aspects of model-based engineering have been adopted previously [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%