“…Chapter 5 is a follow-up investigation of Chapter 4, and studies the hydrodynamic performance of a rectangular floating breakwater with asymmetric pneumatic chambers (a narrower chamber on the seaside and a wider chamber on the leeside of the rectangular floating breakwater). (Koraim, 2013), partially-immersed caissons (Rageh et al, 2009), multiple-layer breakwaters (Wang et al, 2006), twin-plate wave barriers (Neelamani and Gayathri, 2006), box-type breakwaters with a porous plate (Koutandos et al, 2005), absorbing perforated-wall breakwaters (Brossard et al, 2003), ⊥ -type breakwaters (Neelamani and Rajendran, 2002a), T-type breakwaters (Neelamani and Rajendran, 2002b), twin-vertical barriers (Neelamani and Vedagiri, 2002), quadrant front-face breakwaters (Sundar and Subba rao, 2002) and suspended double slotted barriers (Isaacson et al, 1999). All these pile-supported breakwaters were designed to dissipate more wave energy through vortex shedding, generation of turbulence, or wave breaking.…”