2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic efficiency of partially immersed caissons supported on piles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A caisson supported on a tightly spaced pile system, as well as pile breakwaters made up of two rows of circular and square piles positioned in straight and staggered locations, were also investigated. Rageh and Koraim (2010) [24] evaluated an experimental scenario, the performance of barriers caissons supported by two or three columns of piles. The caisson construction and the supporting pile system were tested.…”
Section: Introduction / Uvod *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A caisson supported on a tightly spaced pile system, as well as pile breakwaters made up of two rows of circular and square piles positioned in straight and staggered locations, were also investigated. Rageh and Koraim (2010) [24] evaluated an experimental scenario, the performance of barriers caissons supported by two or three columns of piles. The caisson construction and the supporting pile system were tested.…”
Section: Introduction / Uvod *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of Hsiao et al, 8 revealed that the K r for a porous double-row structure attains a peak for 2S/L (S is the structure gap spacing, L is the incident wavelength) = 1 or 2, for lesser porosity. Rageh et al, 9 introduced a new type of breakwater supported on two or three rows of piles and stated that it exhibited an energy loss coefficient of about 10%-30%. Ji and Suh 10 developed a mathematical model to compute the hydrodynamic characteristics of a multiple-row curtain wall-pile breakwater and validated experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This minimum transmission coefficient is comparable to the transmission coefficients of Stiassnie et al (1986) as well as the wave amplification factors of Neelamani and Rajendran (2002a) and Neelamani and Vedagiri (2002), but much smaller than the transmission coefficients of Koutandos et al (2005) as well as the wave amplification factors of Neelamani and Rajendran (2002b), at the same / B L and with similar relative drafts. ; this minimum transmission coefficient is much smaller than the transmission coefficients of Isaacson et al (1999) and Brossard et al (2003) as well as the wave amplification factors of Koraim (2013), Rageh et al (2009), Neelamani and Gayathri (2006) and Sundar and Subba rao (2002), at the same / B L and with similar relative drafts. It is concluded from this comparison that the performance of the pile-supported OWC-type breakwater is not inferior to all other breakwaters reported in the literature.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Chapter 5 is a follow-up investigation of Chapter 4, and studies the hydrodynamic performance of a rectangular floating breakwater with asymmetric pneumatic chambers (a narrower chamber on the seaside and a wider chamber on the leeside of the rectangular floating breakwater). (Koraim, 2013), partially-immersed caissons (Rageh et al, 2009), multiple-layer breakwaters (Wang et al, 2006), twin-plate wave barriers (Neelamani and Gayathri, 2006), box-type breakwaters with a porous plate (Koutandos et al, 2005), absorbing perforated-wall breakwaters (Brossard et al, 2003), ⊥ -type breakwaters (Neelamani and Rajendran, 2002a), T-type breakwaters (Neelamani and Rajendran, 2002b), twin-vertical barriers (Neelamani and Vedagiri, 2002), quadrant front-face breakwaters (Sundar and Subba rao, 2002) and suspended double slotted barriers (Isaacson et al, 1999). All these pile-supported breakwaters were designed to dissipate more wave energy through vortex shedding, generation of turbulence, or wave breaking.…”
Section: Outline Of Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation