2017
DOI: 10.15282/ijame.14.4.2017.10.0371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic performance of cylindrical floating breakwater in waves

Abstract: Attenuating waves by simple prismatic structures are increasingly recognised for coastal protection. Yet, evaluating their performance as good attenuators inevitably requires a reliable approach to adequately capture the dynamic interaction between waves and structure. This paper presents a prediction on hydrodynamic properties of pile-restrained cylindrical floating breakwater using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. Several parameters for the effects of relative width (/) and relative draft (/) of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 6, the spacing between DCFB structures was designed to have 0.2 m size between the floating cylinders, but between the TCFB units there was no gap. In Figure 7, the size between the floating cylinders have been increased to 0.6 m, while the gap between the DCFB units was increased to 0.5 m. The experimentation in Figure 6 was based the condition as layout in the in Abdullah et al, [12]. The experimentation set up in the Figure 7 was to explore the possibility of improving the wave transmission coefficient by increasing the size between the floating cylinders and to introduce a gap between the TCFB units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Figure 6, the spacing between DCFB structures was designed to have 0.2 m size between the floating cylinders, but between the TCFB units there was no gap. In Figure 7, the size between the floating cylinders have been increased to 0.6 m, while the gap between the DCFB units was increased to 0.5 m. The experimentation in Figure 6 was based the condition as layout in the in Abdullah et al, [12]. The experimentation set up in the Figure 7 was to explore the possibility of improving the wave transmission coefficient by increasing the size between the floating cylinders and to introduce a gap between the TCFB units.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the introduction of DCFB into actual coastal applications can be seen as a desirable solution to the potential environmental hazards in coastal areas [11]. Determining the wave transmission coefficient under different environmental conditions are necessary to identify the most optimum DCFB design and arrangement to effectively protect coastal areas from potential wave damages [12]. Successful application of floating breakwater to mitigate coastal damage not only contribute to the progress in coastal engineering but also improves safety and sustainability of community environments [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). After the model geometry of a perforated breakwater slope has been created, numerical modeling was carried out using one of the Computer Fluid Dynamic (CFD) programs, namely FLOW-3D (Abdullah et al, 2017;Setyandito et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Syed and Mani [14] studied a multiple interconnected pontoon with S/D equal to 0.50 to obtain the same wave attenuation. Recently, a TPFB with mesh cage and suspended balls had been investigated by some authors in moored [9] and pile restrained [15] conditions. In their study, the new type of floating breakwater exhibits a better performance in long waves, however the variable trends of are mostly higher than 0.5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%