2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic simulation for evaluating Magnus anti-rolling devices with varying angles of attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…= 2,13 m  Tinggi tangki = 1,87 m Desain tangki anti-rolling dengan Autocad 3D dilanjutkan pada proses simulasi. Proses simulasi digunakan sebagai metode yang murah, efisien waktu dan biaya dengan tingkat validitas cukup tinggi (Cercos-Pita et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2023;J. Lin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…= 2,13 m  Tinggi tangki = 1,87 m Desain tangki anti-rolling dengan Autocad 3D dilanjutkan pada proses simulasi. Proses simulasi digunakan sebagai metode yang murah, efisien waktu dan biaya dengan tingkat validitas cukup tinggi (Cercos-Pita et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2023;J. Lin et al, 2022).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The experimental setup and the measurements of the hydrodynamic forces generated on the rotating cylinder (rotor) under uniform water flow, including the free surface effect, have been presented in [4]. Another application has been studied in [5], where the Magnus effect is applied to a anti-rolling device; the study addresses the rotor hydrodynamic performance to enhance ship seakeeping strategies at zero and low speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armenio et al [6,7] and Li et al [8] independently developed coupled numerical models based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for the coupled effects. After Li et al [8], many studies have been conducted on this topic in recent years (e.g., Huang et al [9], Taskar et al [10], Jiang et al [11], Cercos-Pita et al [12], Ghamari et al [13], Saripilli and Sen [14], Bulian and Cercos-Pita [15], Diebold et al [16], Alujević et al [17], Lyu et al [18], Zhuang and Wan [19], Alujević et al [20], Subramanian et al [21], Wei et al [22], Bernal-Colio et al [23], Liu et al [24], Yao et al [25], He et al [26], Lin et al [27], Liu et al [28], Lyu et al [29], Sun et al [30], Wen et al [31], Yu et al [32], Chen et al [33], Chen et al [34], Ge et al [35], Kapsenberg and Carette [36], Lee et al [37], Lin et al [38], and Wang et al [39]). However, the dynamics of the ships and floating caissons are different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%