Hydrodynamic simulation of the effects of stable in-channel large wood on the flood hydrographs of a low mountain range creek, Ore Mountains, Germany

Abstract

Abstract. Large wood (LW) can alter the hydromorphological and hydraulic characteristics of rivers and streams and may act positively on a river's ecology by i.e. leading to increased habitat availability. On the contrary, floating as well as stable LW is a potential threat for anthropogenic goods and infrastructure during flood events. Concerning the contradiction of potential risks and positive ecological impacts, addressing the physical effects of stable large wood is highly important. Hydrodynamic models offer the possibility of investigating the hydraulic effects of anchored large wood. However, the work and time involved varies between approaches that incorporate large wood in hydrodynamic models. In this study, a two-dimensional hydraulic model is set up for a mountain creek to simulate the hydraulic effects of stable LW and to compare multiple methods of accounting for LW-induced roughness. LW is implemented by changing in-channel roughness coefficients and by adding topographic elements to the model; this is carried out in order to determine which method most accurately simulates observed hydrographs and to provide guidance for future hydrodynamic modelling of stable large wood with two-dimensional models. The study area comprises a 282 m long reach of the Ullersdorfer Teichbächel, a creek in the Ore Mountains (south-eastern Germany). Discharge time series from field experiments allow for a validation of the model outputs with field observations with and without stable LW. We iterate in-channel roughness coefficients to best fit the mean simulated and observed flood hydrographs with and without LW at the downstream reach outlet. As an alternative approach for modelling LW-induced effects, we use simplified discrete topographic elements representing individual LW elements in the channel. In general, the simulations reveal a high goodness of fit between the observed flood hydrographs and the model results without and with stable in-channel LW. The best fit of the simulation and mean observed hydrograph with in-channel LW can be obtained when increasing in-channel roughness coefficients throughout the reach instead of an increase at LW positions only. The best fit in terms of the hydrograph's general shape can be achieved by integrating discrete elements into the calculation mesh. The results illustrate that the mean observed hydrograph can be satisfactorily modelled using an adjustment of roughness coefficients. In conclusion, a time-consuming and work-intensive mesh manipulation is suitable for analysing the more detailed effects of stable LW on a small spatio-temporal scale where high precision is required. In contrast, the reach-wise adjustment of in-channel roughness coefficients seems to provide similarly accurate results on the reach scale and, thus, could be helpful for practical applications of model-based impact assessments of stable LW on flood hydrographs of small streams and rivers.

An Experimental Investigation of the Hydraulics and Pollutant Dispersion Characteristics of a Model Beaver Dam

“…A number of 1D methods have been used to quantify the hydraulic and hydrological effect of leaky barriers. A simple method often employed is to establish a value for the Manning's roughness value 'n' based on the leaky barrier [34,35]. However, these values cannot easily be generalized, as they are often specific to site and flow conditions induced by specific rainfall events [34,36].…”

“…A simple method often employed is to establish a value for the Manning's roughness value 'n' based on the leaky barrier [34,35]. However, these values cannot easily be generalized, as they are often specific to site and flow conditions induced by specific rainfall events [34,36]. Weir equations can also be used as a simple approach to estimate storage, by representing leaky barriers as different shaped weirs [24,37] or as sluice gates [24,38,39].…”

Modelling the Impact of Leaky Barriers with a 1D Godunov-Type Scheme for the Shallow Water Equations

“…A popular method for including leaky barriers in a model is to change parameters at the location of the barriers. For example, online barriers are often represented as increased values of Manning's n, both in hydrological models [36,53] and hydraulic models [54,55]. However, even if these parameter values come from the field, it is inappropriate to apply them to other sites or flow conditions [56].…”