2014
DOI: 10.1021/ie402815v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics of Microbubble Suspension Flow in Pipes

Abstract: Microbubbles exhibit excellent gas-dissolution abilities owing to their larger gas–liquid interfacial areas and longer residence times compared to conventional larger bubbles. Hence, it is expected that microbubbles should increase the efficiency of gas–liquid contact devices for various applications in chemical and biochemical processes. In most of these applications, it is necessary to understand the hydrodynamics, such as the rheology, pressure drop, and friction factor, associated with microbubble flow in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gas–liquid surface tension is seen to be insensitive to SDS concentration in this range of SDS concentrations, changing by less than 2%, to find the dependency ofbut at the same time d b and k L a respond very strongly to the presence of the SDS, as seen in the plot. The literature consensus is that surfactants cause a reduction in k L . We hypothesize that this surprising result is mediated by hydrodynamic slip vs nonslip flow at ∼10 μm spatial scales on the bubble–liquid interface during bubble collisions, such that a <1% change in surface tension is sufficient to alter the slip/no‐slip condition during bubble collision and drastically change the bubble coalescence rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gas–liquid surface tension is seen to be insensitive to SDS concentration in this range of SDS concentrations, changing by less than 2%, to find the dependency ofbut at the same time d b and k L a respond very strongly to the presence of the SDS, as seen in the plot. The literature consensus is that surfactants cause a reduction in k L . We hypothesize that this surprising result is mediated by hydrodynamic slip vs nonslip flow at ∼10 μm spatial scales on the bubble–liquid interface during bubble collisions, such that a <1% change in surface tension is sufficient to alter the slip/no‐slip condition during bubble collision and drastically change the bubble coalescence rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The literature consensus is that surfactants cause a reduction in k L . [17][18][19][48][49][50][51][52][53] We hypothesize that this surprising result is mediated by hydrodynamic slip vs nonslip flow at $10 μm spatial scales on the bubble-liquid interface during bubble collisions, such that a <1% change in surface tension is sufficient to alter the slip/no-slip condition during bubble collision and drastically change the bubble coalescence rate. Deeper analysis of this coalescence phenomenon is the focus of a forthcoming paper.…”
Section: Multiple Linear Regression On the Parameter Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface tension of the liquid was measured by tensiometer (Model K9-MK1, KRÜSS GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). It is well known that microbubble suspension is a time- independent non-Newtonian pseudo-plastic fluid and its rheology is described by Ostwald-De Waele model or Power law model [21] t…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wall shear stress and apparent shear rate can be calculated from the volumetric flow rate of microbubble suspension (Q) and pressure drop (DP) in the pipe according to the following relations [21] …”
Section: Experimental Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation