2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781119133957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamics of Time‐Periodic Groundwater Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researchers modeled periodic groundwater flow velocity as a sinusoidal function versus time where is the period for a full tidal cycle (Depner and Rasmussen, 2016). In general, consolidation is modeled as an increase of the water upwelling decreasing over time as the sediment seabed reaches the equilibrium.…”
Section: Design Aspects and Modeling Approaches Of An Isc Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers modeled periodic groundwater flow velocity as a sinusoidal function versus time where is the period for a full tidal cycle (Depner and Rasmussen, 2016). In general, consolidation is modeled as an increase of the water upwelling decreasing over time as the sediment seabed reaches the equilibrium.…”
Section: Design Aspects and Modeling Approaches Of An Isc Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These periodic responses are characterized using the amplitude attenuation between the forcing and the response, with their amplitude ratio being a function of the aquifer transmissivity (Rasmussen, et al., 2003) and storativity (Shi, Wang, Liu, et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2019). Also, the phase lag is an inverse function of the hydraulic diffusivity ( D = T / S ), with larger phase lags present in media with lower diffusivity (Depner & Rasmussen, 2016; Doan et al., 2006; Hsieh, Bredehoeft, & Rojstaczer, 1988; Rasmussen et al., 2003). The phase lag is a function of both horizontal flow within the aquifer as well as the lag time associated with water exchange between the aquifer and wellbore (Hsieh, Bredehoeft, & Farr, 1987), where the phase shift is absent in coupled (Doan et al., 2006) and inelastic (Rasmussen et al., 2003) systems.…”
Section: Hydrogeological Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aquifer response Δ S n at the distance r to a given harmonic, Qt=Qnnormalmaxcosωnt, can be written in terms of an amplitude solution (Black and Kipp 1981; Depner and Rasmussen 2016) for harmonic flow oscillation: ΔSn=Qnmax2πitalicTN0rRn=QmaxπTnN0rRn where Rn=a/ωn;N0x=normalKer2x+normalKei2x;ΔSn is the oscillation amplitude of the head change due to component Qnnormalmax, N 0 is the amplitude of the Kelvin function of the second kind and is the sum of squares of its real part Ker and its imaginary part Kei (Abramowitz and Stegun 1964).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aquifer response S n at the distance r to a given harmonic, Q(t) = Q max n cos(ω n t), can be written in terms of an amplitude solution (Black and Kipp 1981;Depner and Rasmussen 2016) for harmonic flow oscillation:…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%