1973
DOI: 10.1021/j100622a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen atom abstraction by fluorine atoms

Abstract: The relative rates of abstraction of hydrogen atoms by 18F atoms have been measured for H2, D2, CH*, CD*, C2H6, CH3CF3, H2S, and HI vs. the rate of addition to acetylene. The measurements have involved the competitive diminution in yield of CH2=CH18F (from CH18F=CH + HI) vs. RH(or RD)/C2H2 ratio. The samples contained excess SFe which served both as the target for formation of 18F by the 19F(n,2n)18F nuclear reaction, and as the moderator for the excess recoil energy of these 18F atoms. The relative rates per … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 X 10 cc/mol-sec. This result for k. agrees well with those 5 4 • of jfoon and Reid (1971) and of Williams and Rowland (1973) but is a factor of 2.5 to 10 lower than most of the other determinations. Rabideau, Hecht, and Lewis (1972) gave no indication of the sensitivity of their result for k. to changes in their result for k,.…”
Section: Bsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2 X 10 cc/mol-sec. This result for k. agrees well with those 5 4 • of jfoon and Reid (1971) and of Williams and Rowland (1973) but is a factor of 2.5 to 10 lower than most of the other determinations. Rabideau, Hecht, and Lewis (1972) gave no indication of the sensitivity of their result for k. to changes in their result for k,.…”
Section: Bsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Molecular diameter appeared to be the most sensitive parameter where small variations changed the yield from 0 to 100%. Our optimized radius for the model was 2.4 Â in good agreement with the experimental value of 2.1 Ä [40]. BUNKER and JACOBSON [35] simulated the radical recombination caging of iodine in carbon tetrachloride.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It is therefore interesting to investigate the resonance contribution to the computed F+CH 4 → FH+CH 3 crosssection in a little more detail. The most effective way is to combine the expected resonance contribution with the reaction probability at v =0 [40,41] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%