2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen bonds with π-acceptors in proteins: frequencies and role in stabilizing local 3D structures11Edited by R. Huber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

27
431
1
18

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 503 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
27
431
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…. Ͻ 4.0 Å [3.5 Å]) (41). This type of hydrogen bond is rarely found and is suggested to be weaker than classical hydrogen bonds (41).…”
Section: Impact Of Cys 67 For the Coordination Of Pr2 In The B Pocketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Ͻ 4.0 Å [3.5 Å]) (41). This type of hydrogen bond is rarely found and is suggested to be weaker than classical hydrogen bonds (41).…”
Section: Impact Of Cys 67 For the Coordination Of Pr2 In The B Pocketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In addition, weaker donor groups such as Ca-H and methyl-H are also possible contributors to protein stability. [5][6][7][8][9] More specifically, other hydrogen-bond-like, NCIs have been implicated, including the n!p* interaction [10][11][12] and methyl-p interactions. 13,14 These particular interactions are much weaker than canonical hydrogen bonds: the latter are typically worth 3-10 kcal/ mol 15,16 ; whereas, n!p* interactions are estimated at 0.7-1.2 kcal/mol, 10,16 and methyl-p interactions at 0.9-1.5 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] X-H⋯π interactions have also been identified in proteins [19,22,23] and N-H⋯π interactions can be sufficiently strong to affect secondary (folding) structure. [24] Estimations of the strengths of X-H⋯π interactions have typically relied on the determination of the thermodynamics of complexation. This can be informative in the gas phase but in condensed phases, the difficulty of separating the intrinsic strength of the H-bonding interaction from the contribution of solvation energies to the stability constant has thwarted the development of useful scales of π basicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31,32] Sometimes one of the acceptors of a bifurcated H-bond is an O-atom, the other an alkyne [19,33,34] or arene. [24,35] Bi-or multifurcated H-bonds are frequently deduced from protein crystallography. [36] The solution phase existence of compounds with bifurcated π-H bonds involving only unsaturated hydrocarbons has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%