Diffusion in Solids 1975
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-522660-8.50010-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Diffusion in Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
84
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 223 publications
8
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include, in addition to derivatives from steady rates of hydrogen permeation across a known concentration gradient and from breakthrough times related to detection of hydrogen at the side of membranes remote from hydrogen introduction q u a s i e l a s t i c n e u t r o n s c a t t e r i n g (29, I 18, I 36,163-1 65,201) and anelastic Gorsky Effect measurements (51,(169)(170)(171)(172)(173). At very low ix phase hydrogen contents, a large measure of agreement now exists between values derived by the various methods (104,202). At 25°C these are of the order of I o -'/cm2/s representing an average value over the narrow a phase range of contents within which the only reported trend has been that of a slight decrease with increasing hydrogen content (86).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These include, in addition to derivatives from steady rates of hydrogen permeation across a known concentration gradient and from breakthrough times related to detection of hydrogen at the side of membranes remote from hydrogen introduction q u a s i e l a s t i c n e u t r o n s c a t t e r i n g (29, I 18, I 36,163-1 65,201) and anelastic Gorsky Effect measurements (51,(169)(170)(171)(172)(173). At very low ix phase hydrogen contents, a large measure of agreement now exists between values derived by the various methods (104,202). At 25°C these are of the order of I o -'/cm2/s representing an average value over the narrow a phase range of contents within which the only reported trend has been that of a slight decrease with increasing hydrogen content (86).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The activation energy for diffusion is also assumed to be independent of the mass of the isotope. Diffusion data at subambient temperatures do not support equation 20 for a number of metals [11], however, permeability data at elevated temperatures generally support the inverse square root dependence on mass for nickel [12] and stainless steels [13][14][15][16]. For the purposes of this report we assume that equation 20 is a good approximation for both permeability and diffusivity; implicitly then the solubility is assumed to be independent of the mass of the isotope.…”
Section: Mass/isotope Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this approximation is invoked, the activation energy for diffusion is generally assumed to be independent of the mass of the isotope. Diffusion data at subambient temperatures do not support equation 3 for a number of metals [2], however, at elevated temperatures, the inverse square root dependence on mass generally provides a reasonable approximation (especially for fcc structural metals) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. While equation 3 provides a good engineering estimate of the relative diffusivity of hydrogen and its isotopes, more advanced theories have been applied to explain experimental data; for example, quantum corrections and anharmonic effects can account for experimentally observed differences of diffusivity of isotopes compared to the predictions of equation 3 [3,10].…”
Section: Diffusivitymentioning
confidence: 99%