2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen generation from alkaline NaBH 4 solution using electroless-deposited Co–W–P supported on γ-Al 2 O 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison with the fresh sample (inset, left), indicates that surface is covered by a layer, which also shows lamellar shaped hexagonal precipitates. This layer (indicated by arrows) has similar aspect of that usually attributed to B-O compounds [7][8][9][10][11][12]15]. However, the formation of hexagonal, lamella-like precipitates was not reported before for this system.…”
Section: Low Sb Concentration Conditions In Cyclessupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison with the fresh sample (inset, left), indicates that surface is covered by a layer, which also shows lamellar shaped hexagonal precipitates. This layer (indicated by arrows) has similar aspect of that usually attributed to B-O compounds [7][8][9][10][11][12]15]. However, the formation of hexagonal, lamella-like precipitates was not reported before for this system.…”
Section: Low Sb Concentration Conditions In Cyclessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It is clear that the catalyst surface is strongly modified upon contact with aqueous media, because in these conditions cobalt is unstable, and oxidizes to Co II (which can further react with OH -) according to Pourbaix diagram [21]. The catalyst after exposure to pure water has similar aspect to that usually attributed to the formation of the B-O layer [7][8][9][10][11][12]15].…”
Section: For a Better Comprehension Of The Interaction Between The Rementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peaks at around 777.9 and 793.1 eV are assigned to Co2p 3/2 and Co2p 1/2 of Co, respectively, those at around 780.8 and 796.8 eV to Co2p 3/2 and Co2p 1/2 of Co 2+ , respectively, and those around 785.3 and 802.6 eV to the shake-up satellite peaks of Co 2+ . 23,[25][26][27][28] The peaks at 852.4 and 869.8 eV are ascribed to Ni2p 3/2 and Ni2p 1/2 of Ni, 855.9 and 873.5 eV to Ni2p 3/2 and Ni2p 1/2 of Ni 2+ , and 861.2 and 879.6 eV to the shake-up satellite peaks of Ni 2+ . 17,[27][28][29][30] The peaks at 187.8 and 191.7 eV arise from B1s, the former is ascribed to B and the latter to B 3+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…23,[25][26][27][28] The peaks at 852.4 and 869.8 eV are ascribed to Ni2p 3/2 and Ni2p 1/2 of Ni, 855.9 and 873.5 eV to Ni2p 3/2 and Ni2p 1/2 of Ni 2+ , and 861.2 and 879.6 eV to the shake-up satellite peaks of Ni 2+ . 17,[27][28][29][30] The peaks at 187.8 and 191.7 eV arise from B1s, the former is ascribed to B and the latter to B 3+ . 17,20 The peak at 129.3 eV is attributed to P with Co and Ni, whereas the peak at around 133.1 eV to the oxidized P. 19,27,29 These results indicated that Co, Ni, P, and B in the catalysts are both in atomic states and oxidation states.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%