2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11093885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Permeability of Epoxy Composites as Liners in Lined Rock Caverns—Experimental Study

Abstract: Energy production from renewable energy sources is not stable and any fluctuations in energy productions need to be eliminated with underground energy storage. Demand of underground gas storage will be increasing, due to the switching to green energy, while the availability of underground storage sites, especially salt caverns suitable for hydrogen storage, is limited. The purpose of this paper is to compare the hydrogen permeability of different materials and select a proper liner material for hydrogen storag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Permeability values (Figure 11) are in the range of 3 × 10 3 ÷ 6 × 10 5 Barrer for hydrogen and in the range of 2 × 10 3 ÷ 2 × 10 4 Barrer for methane; similar trends are observed on both caprocks. The permeability values (3 × 10 3 ÷ 2 × 10 4 Barrer) obtained at Pp = 80% (about 0.8 bar) (Figure 11) are consistent with values measured by Gajda and Luty ński [51] for a clay mineral-based mudstone (2330 Barrer) at a 1 MPa feed gas pressure. Despite the different adsorption enthalpies [52], measured gas uptakes for hydrogen and methane are comparable (Figure 12).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Permeability values (Figure 11) are in the range of 3 × 10 3 ÷ 6 × 10 5 Barrer for hydrogen and in the range of 2 × 10 3 ÷ 2 × 10 4 Barrer for methane; similar trends are observed on both caprocks. The permeability values (3 × 10 3 ÷ 2 × 10 4 Barrer) obtained at Pp = 80% (about 0.8 bar) (Figure 11) are consistent with values measured by Gajda and Luty ński [51] for a clay mineral-based mudstone (2330 Barrer) at a 1 MPa feed gas pressure. Despite the different adsorption enthalpies [52], measured gas uptakes for hydrogen and methane are comparable (Figure 12).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Several designs can be used to study hydrogen. Dawid and Marcin David [12] studied hydrogen permeability using steady-state flow and carrier gas methods. Depending on the sample permeability, the setup between the two approaches indicated can be changed.…”
Section: Equipment and Configuration For Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, if a more impermeable matrix is chosen (e.g., epoxy), the kinetics could be much slower (a few weeks). 26,28 This study explored two approaches to prevent hydrogenmetal contact. In the rst approach (hydrogen barrier), a PDMS-composite loaded with GNP particles decreased the hydrogen diffusion in the matrix by one order of magnitude, while in the second approach (absorption), a PDMS-based composite loaded with a getter was found to efficiently absorb the hydrogen molecules (getter saturation > 86%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%