2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen production enhancement using hot gas cleaning system combined with prepared Ni-based catalyst in biomass gasification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A two-stage reactor system was used by Ngo et al 82 to produce hydrogen from the gasification of rice straw. The process included a fluidized-bed reactor working at 800 °C as a gasifier followed by a packed bed reactor filled with the Ni-based catalyst working at 250 °C or 400 °C to enhance the amount of H 2 in the gas product.…”
Section: Biorefinery Based On the Thermochemical Treatment-commercial...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-stage reactor system was used by Ngo et al 82 to produce hydrogen from the gasification of rice straw. The process included a fluidized-bed reactor working at 800 °C as a gasifier followed by a packed bed reactor filled with the Ni-based catalyst working at 250 °C or 400 °C to enhance the amount of H 2 in the gas product.…”
Section: Biorefinery Based On the Thermochemical Treatment-commercial...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process also generates a pure stream of CO 2 that can be reused. Figure 4 illustrates the process flow of syn gas production from biomass and reforming of producer gas for better applicability [102,110]. illustrates the process flow of syn gas production from biomass and reforming of producer gas for better applicability [102,110].…”
Section: Producer Gas Reformingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, by Ngo et al [88], producer gas from the gasification of rice straw underwent steam reforming at 400 • C using a zeolite catalyst to enhance hydrogen generation and minimize tar yield. The H 2 and CO contents of the syngas after SMR increased from 7.31 vol.% to 14.57 vol.% and 8.03 vol.% to 17.34 vol.%, respectively, while tar removal efficiency was observed at 70-90%.…”
Section: Producer Gas Processing: Steam Methane Reformingmentioning
confidence: 99%