2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.11.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen production via steam reforming of different fuels: thermodynamic comparison

Alessandra Di Nardo,
Maria Portarapillo,
Danilo Russo
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, consistent results were achieved through simulations conducted in both Microsoft Excel and DWSIM, covering the entire range of temperatures and pressures. However, values obtained from COCO simulations were consistently higher than those from the other software, although this discrepancy diminishes when temperatures reach 800 • C. 2024), they reported 𝑋 values of 0.225 at 600 °C, 0.311 at 700 °C, 0.321 at 800 °C, and 0.319 at 900 °C, all under a pressure of 1 bar and an S/C ratio of 4 and at an intake flow rate of 8 kmol/h [29].…”
Section: Hydrogen Productionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remarkably, consistent results were achieved through simulations conducted in both Microsoft Excel and DWSIM, covering the entire range of temperatures and pressures. However, values obtained from COCO simulations were consistently higher than those from the other software, although this discrepancy diminishes when temperatures reach 800 • C. 2024), they reported 𝑋 values of 0.225 at 600 °C, 0.311 at 700 °C, 0.321 at 800 °C, and 0.319 at 900 °C, all under a pressure of 1 bar and an S/C ratio of 4 and at an intake flow rate of 8 kmol/h [29].…”
Section: Hydrogen Productionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because of this, the maximum values of 𝑋 can be attained at 700 °C and 1 bar of pressure according to all three simulation methods. C, all under a pressure of 1 bar and an S/C ratio of 4 and at an intake flow rate of 8 kmol/h [29].…”
Section: Hydrogen Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%