2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2020.101743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen refuelling station calibration with a traceable gravimetric standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The filling sequence is as shown on the legend, starting with 20 to 700 bar, then 20 to 350 bar, 350 to 700 bar etc. This is the same sequence followed in the test programme carried out by CESAME and Air Liquide during the MetroHyVe 1 project [2]. As expected, the predicted error ranges are broadly consistent with the results for "Configuration 1" stations in the field verifications.…”
Section: Nosupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The filling sequence is as shown on the legend, starting with 20 to 700 bar, then 20 to 350 bar, 350 to 700 bar etc. This is the same sequence followed in the test programme carried out by CESAME and Air Liquide during the MetroHyVe 1 project [2]. As expected, the predicted error ranges are broadly consistent with the results for "Configuration 1" stations in the field verifications.…”
Section: Nosupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The need for this tool was recognised after surveying HRS operators in the first MetroHyVe project and observing that: 1) there are major differences in design between HRS, 2) certain aspects of the design can lead to large errors at the dispenser, and 3) although it is possible to apply corrections to eliminate some major sources of billing error, these corrections are not applied in many HRS. Evidence of this is provided by field verifications performed during the project [2]; measurements at seven different HRS showed that the stations studied could be categorised either as "Configuration 1" or "Configuration 2", where the Configuration 1 stations displayed distinctive error trends dominated by uncorrected "dead volume" effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies have investigated how to inspect and verify such accuracies of flow measurements under hydrogen-filling operating conditions at hydrogen refueling stations. It should also be noted that several portable gravimetric standards in national metrology institutes and the manufacturing companies of hydrogen dispensers in several countries have been developed for field verification according to the international recommendation for hydrogen refueling stations [6,7]. In a cooperative project for hydrogen vehicles by several European national metrology institutes, mobile gravimetric standards for verifying the measurements by the flowmeters inside the hydrogen dispensers were developed [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a cooperative project for hydrogen vehicles by several European national metrology institutes, mobile gravimetric standards for verifying the measurements by the flowmeters inside the hydrogen dispensers were developed [8]. Several hydrogen refueling stations were tested in Europe using the gravimetric standard developed during this project for the purpose of research related to the MPE acceptance criteria as defined in OIML R 139-1, which is the international recommendation [6][7][8]. The Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) also developed a Hydrogen Field Test Standard (HFTS) that can be used for the field verification and calibration of the measurement accuracy of the mass flowmeters used at hydrogen refueling stations, as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation