2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6601-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen responses of ultrathin Pd films and nanowire networks with a Ti buffer layer

Abstract: We report on hydrogen responses of ultrathin films and nanowire networks of palladium on titanium buffered silicon substrates and filtration membranes, respectively. We found that in both systems signatures such as retarding responses and saturation of the resistance changes at high hydrogen concentrations associated with the transition from Pd/H solid solution to Pd hydride diminish with decreasing the thickness of the palladium layer from 7 to 2 nm. Our results not only reveal a new way to suppress the phase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After absorbing 1.5% hydrogen gas, the nanoparticle sensor spends more than 2000 s to recover to original baseline level in pure argon, but the recovery time of the nanofilm sensor is only less than 1000 s. In addition, as shown in Fig. 10 recovery time of the nanofilm sensor after exposure to 2% H 2 is about 500 s and recovery time of the nanoparticle sensor after exposure to 0.5% H 2 is about 980 s. The results are close to the re- sult obtained by Rahimi et al [36], but better than the result obtained by Zeng et al [3]. For sensing hydrogen gas with higher concentration (>3%), it takes two or three days to recover the baseline level for the nanoparticle with large diameter, and the recovery time of the nanofilm was less than 24 h.…”
Section: Recovery Time and Reversibility Of The Sensorssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After absorbing 1.5% hydrogen gas, the nanoparticle sensor spends more than 2000 s to recover to original baseline level in pure argon, but the recovery time of the nanofilm sensor is only less than 1000 s. In addition, as shown in Fig. 10 recovery time of the nanofilm sensor after exposure to 2% H 2 is about 500 s and recovery time of the nanoparticle sensor after exposure to 0.5% H 2 is about 980 s. The results are close to the re- sult obtained by Rahimi et al [36], but better than the result obtained by Zeng et al [3]. For sensing hydrogen gas with higher concentration (>3%), it takes two or three days to recover the baseline level for the nanoparticle with large diameter, and the recovery time of the nanofilm was less than 24 h.…”
Section: Recovery Time and Reversibility Of The Sensorssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…2. In this article, to avoid interference of complex gas and study behaviors of Pd-Ni alloy nanofilm and nanoparticles in H 2 , we chose argon as the carrier gas like many researchers' choice [3,23,29]. The concentration of hydrogen in argon was adjusted from 0% to 10% (V/V) by blending commercially standard H 2 -Ar mixture with pure argon through a gas-blending system.…”
Section: Hydrogen Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…D UE to their large surface area to volume ratio and available space for making electrical contacts, individual nanowires have been widely considered as interconnects or sensing elements in nanodevices [1]- [3]. For example, hydrogen gas (H 2 ) sensors based on individual palladium (Pd) nanowires show much improved performance in speed, sensitivity, and ultralow power consumption in comparison to their counterparts based on palladium thin or thick films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%