Materials for Sustainable Energy 2010
DOI: 10.1142/9789814317665_0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications

Abstract: Energy can be stored in different forms: as mechanical energy (for example, potential energy or rotation energy of a flywheel); in an electric or magnetic field (capacitors and coils, respectively); as chemical energy of reactants and fuels (batteries, petrol or hydrogen); or as nuclear fuel (uranium or deuterium). Chemical and electric energy can be transmitted easily because they both involve electronic Coulomb interaction. Chemical energy is based on the energy of unpaired outer electrons (valence electrons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
228
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
228
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early euphoric reports of over 60 wt% storage of hydrogen in carbon nanofibers at ambient temperatures and 112 bar pressure (Chambers et al 1998) and of up to 20 wt% in alkali-doped nanotubes at 1 bar pressure (Chen et al 1999) have been however scaled down by subsequent studies. Proven storage for carbon nanotubes remains at less than 8 wt% of hydrogen even at cryogenic conditions of 77 K, and a meager 1.5 wt% at ambient temperature (Schlapbach and Zuttel 2001;Pfeifer et al 2008;Poirier et al 2004). Similar conclusion comes out from numerical simulation (Wang and Johnson 1999;Bathia and Myers 2006;Gigras et al 2007).…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Early euphoric reports of over 60 wt% storage of hydrogen in carbon nanofibers at ambient temperatures and 112 bar pressure (Chambers et al 1998) and of up to 20 wt% in alkali-doped nanotubes at 1 bar pressure (Chen et al 1999) have been however scaled down by subsequent studies. Proven storage for carbon nanotubes remains at less than 8 wt% of hydrogen even at cryogenic conditions of 77 K, and a meager 1.5 wt% at ambient temperature (Schlapbach and Zuttel 2001;Pfeifer et al 2008;Poirier et al 2004). Similar conclusion comes out from numerical simulation (Wang and Johnson 1999;Bathia and Myers 2006;Gigras et al 2007).…”
supporting
confidence: 69%
“…Another comparison of volumetric versus gravimetric storage density including solid storage systems is given in Figure 1.25 [26]. It is obvious that, with regard to volumetric storage density, storage of hydrogen in compounds has the greater potential.…”
Section: Comparison Of Energy Densities J33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained above, scientists do not even agree yet on the number of guest molecules occupying the cages of hydrates. This is why Schlapbach and Zuttel [50] suggest that the key to the fabrication of proper hydrogen storage materials lies in further characterization of the fundamental nature and strength of hydrogen bonding interactions with a variety of host materials. Fortunately, with the discovery of hydrogen clathrate hydrates in 1999 and the spark of the idea of hydrogen storage in hydrates, the current decade is witnessing some activity by various groups.…”
Section: Future Of Hydrogen Storagementioning
confidence: 99%