1996
DOI: 10.1021/ie9502749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen Sulfide Capture by Limestone and Dolomite at Elevated Pressure. 1. Sorbent Performance

Abstract: Sulfur emission control in fossil fuel gasification plants implies the removal of H2S from the product gas either inside the furnace or in the gas clean-up system. In a fluidized-bed gasifier, in-bed sulfur capture can be accomplished by adding a calcium-based sorbent such as limestone or dolomite to the bed and removing the sulfur from the system with the bottom ash in the form of CaS. This work describes the H2S uptake by a set of physically and chemically different limestones and dolomites under pressurized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Carbonization decreased the pore size of the CaO sample considerably. (4) Pores that are larger than about 300 nm in CaO, which was used as the precursor of CaCO 3 , may play a significant role in controlling the reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Carbonization decreased the pore size of the CaO sample considerably. (4) Pores that are larger than about 300 nm in CaO, which was used as the precursor of CaCO 3 , may play a significant role in controlling the reactivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organically associated Ca can recapture the H 2 S to form sulfidic sulfur at temperatures above 873 K. Pyrolysis at temperatures of 873-1073 K, of ion-exchanged acid-washed coals with calcium acetate solution has revealed a significant increase of the sulfidic sulfur in the char [253]. In fluidized bed gasification/combustion, the role of Ca-based sorbent such as limestone or dolomite in capturing H 2 S/SO 2 has been well documented [254][255][256][257][258]. Given the high content of AAEM in some biomass fuels, sulfur capture by these metals could be an added advantage of co-conversion of coal and biomass based fuels.…”
Section: Effect Of Blending Coal and Biomass/waste On The Fate Of Sulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding to the various particle size ranges of the lime (125-180 μm, 180-250μm, 250-350μm), the desulphurization rates were up to 79.38%, 80.97% and 81.56%, respectively. As mentioned in the literature (Saastamoinen and Shimizu, 2007;Yrjas et al, 1996), lime with smaller size had a higher reactivity. However, the small particles were more inclined to attrition and fragmentation, and the small particles could be carried out by the gas stream.…”
Section: Effect Of Lime Particle Sizementioning
confidence: 56%