Reconnaissance geochemical data used in this study are from the reanalysis by the U.S. Geological Survey of 3,551 stream-sediment and soil samples collected in the area of the Winnemucca District and Surprise Resource Area during the National Uranium Resource Evaluation (NURE) program, combined with data for 321 stream-sediment samples collected in the area by the USGS in 1993. The area includes a total of 13.5 million acres in northwest Nevada and northeast Caliifornia and is referred to herein as the Winnemucca-Surprise Resource Assessment Area (WSRAA). The analyses included 40-element, and 10-element methods of inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), and Au by atomic absorption (AA), with graphite furnace. Data from a number of other studies in the area of the WSRAA were consulted and used in the interpretation, including data for 1,904 stream-sediment samples from a study by Barringer Resources, Inc., of BLM wilderness study areas within the Winnemucca District. The results of this study indicate the presence of a large number of geochemical anomalies in the area of the WSRAA. Most of the anomalies are in the areas of mining districts, and probably relate to known mineral deposits of the districts, but may also in part reflect contamination from mined deposits. The relationship of the anomalies to the mining districts is evident on geochemical maps included in this report. These maps show the distribution and abundance of antimony, arsenic, barium, copper, gold, lead, lithium, molybdenum, silver, and zinc, and the locations of 96 mining districts. Many of the anomalies are, however, not apparently related to mining districts. Some of the more prominent of these anomalies are encircled on the maps and discussed individually. Some of these areas contain known mineral deposits and are areas of recent mineral exploration. The distribution of geochemical anomalies suggests areas for further exploration. Factor analysis was used to aid in defining multi-element suites. An 8-factor model was selected and maps of varimax factor scores for these factors, which show lithologic and mineralization associations, are included in this report. The plot of factor scores for one of the factors (factor 1), although largely a lithologic factor, may be useful in exploration for iron or massive sulfide deposits. A mineralization factor (factor 3) shows high factor scores in many of the mining districts. Elsewhere, high factor scores for this factor suggest areas for mineral exploration. Table 3. Mining districts, commodities, and associated geochemical anomalies in the Winnemucca-Surprise Resource Assessment Area [Mining district names and commodities are from Tingley (1992). Geochemical anomalies are based on results of this study.] MAP MINING DISTRICT NO