2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrokinetic power for energy access in rural Ghana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Miller et al discussed the energy scenario in Ghana and proposed the hydrokinetic technology in order to fulfill the energy requirement for rural communities. Cross‐flow hydrokinetic turbines connected in series on a single shaft were proposed to develop the power.…”
Section: Cases Studies and Technical Feasibility Of Installations Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Miller et al discussed the energy scenario in Ghana and proposed the hydrokinetic technology in order to fulfill the energy requirement for rural communities. Cross‐flow hydrokinetic turbines connected in series on a single shaft were proposed to develop the power.…”
Section: Cases Studies and Technical Feasibility Of Installations Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miller et al 131 discussed the energy scenario in Ghana and proposed the hydrokinetic technology in order to •The modified shape of the blade profile also helps to reduce the vortices in the downstream.…”
Section: Cases Studies and Technical Feasibility Of Installations Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miller et al estimated the cost of energy for installing 16 turbines per site in the rural communities of Ghana by implementing hydrokinetic technology and stated that the cost of hydrokinetic power plant per turbine includes material cost of $360, installation cost of $4750 per site, labor cost of $1276 per site, and maintenance cost of around 5.5% of the annual revenues and estimated that the expected cost of energy is around $0.035/kWh per user.…”
Section: Cost Of Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the estimated cost of energy for Igiugig and Eagle villages as shown in Table 5 is not commercially attractive, but for Whitestone village, the cost is cheaper than solar energy. Miller et al 25 Kusakana 94 carried out a techno-economic analysis on hydrokinetic technology working in eight different hybrid combinations on two different sites (rural household and base transceiver station) using Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewable (HOMER) and among eight combinations, which include HKT (hydrokinetic turbines), PV (photovoltaic panels), WT (wind turbines), DG (diesel generators), HKT + PV, HKT + DG, PV + DG, and HKT + PV + DG; the best option is selected on the basis of net present cost and cost of energy. The obtained net present cost and cost of energy as shown in Figure 13 and Table 6 reveal that the hybrid system composed of HKT + DG not only is the best suitable option for economical supply for both sites but also contributes in the reduction of carbon dioxide pollutant.…”
Section: Cost Of Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slope is a strong factor influencing power potential although there are other factors influencing the output of hydrokinetic power production in Ikere Gorge basins. Miller et al (2010) reported that Hydro Kinetic Power [HKP] has a lower cost per unit of energy extracted than Hydro Potential Power [HPP] system, and is economically compared with other distributed system such as solar, wind and others making it a better method for policy support and compliance. Therefore, government and non-governmental organization should invest on hydrokinetic energy for human and socio-economic building of the country including industrial growth and development.…”
Section: Relationship Between Potential Hydrokinetic Energy and Selecmentioning
confidence: 99%