2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologic controls on water chemistry and mercury biotransformation in a closed river system: The Carson River, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ranges of methylation and demethylation rates used in this study were limited to rates reported in Stamenkovic et al (2004) for different reaches of SBC, and therefore the calibrated rates (Tables 4 and 5) fall within these ranges. Measured methylation/ demethylation (M/D) ratios in SBC ranged from 0.02 to 6.46 (Stamenkovic et al, 2004), and reported M/D ratios in the Carson River systems have ranged from 0.2 to 10 (Bonzongo, Nemer, & Lyons, 2006). The calibrated values of 0.02-0.20 for the current study fall well within the ranges presented by Gilmour and Henry (1991) of <0.03-6.…”
Section: Figures 3 and 4 Show The Calibrated Model Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The ranges of methylation and demethylation rates used in this study were limited to rates reported in Stamenkovic et al (2004) for different reaches of SBC, and therefore the calibrated rates (Tables 4 and 5) fall within these ranges. Measured methylation/ demethylation (M/D) ratios in SBC ranged from 0.02 to 6.46 (Stamenkovic et al, 2004), and reported M/D ratios in the Carson River systems have ranged from 0.2 to 10 (Bonzongo, Nemer, & Lyons, 2006). The calibrated values of 0.02-0.20 for the current study fall well within the ranges presented by Gilmour and Henry (1991) of <0.03-6.…”
Section: Figures 3 and 4 Show The Calibrated Model Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The percent recovery on the IAEA-405 averaged 95±11% (n=10) and 93±8% (n=10) for THg and MeHg, respectively. Details regarding analytical procedures have been described elsewhere (e.g., Warner et al 2003Warner et al , 2005Bonzongo et al 2006;Donkor et al 2005Donkor et al , 2006Byrne et al 2009;Cohen et al 2009). …”
Section: Mercury Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury contamination exists in some western Nevada soils due to gold milling and smelting of ores dating back to the nineteenth century mining of the Comstock Lode near Virginia City. Contamination of soils by methyl mercury along the Carson River and tributaries to the Truckee River has impacts on stream restoration, constructed wetland projects, and health of fisheries in Lahontan Reservoir and Pyramid Lake (Gustin et al 1994;Bonzongo et al 2006). Scientists have also requested soil geochemical data related to W for investigating a childhood leukemia cluster in Fallon, Nevada.…”
Section: Geochemical Applications Within Soil Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%