2021
DOI: 10.4136/ambi-agua.2639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological modeling in a basin of the Brazilian Cerrado biome

Abstract: The Brazilian Cerrado biome (BCB) is among 25 biodiversity hotspots identified worldwide, and covers the recharge area of important aquifers and rivers in South America. The increase in deforestation has been threatening water availability in this region. In order to assist in the water-resource management of the BCB, this study models the daily streamflow in a basin of the Cerrado, using two approaches: a process-based model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool - SWAT) and the data-driven model (Artificial Neural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rodrigues et al (2020), which applied the SWAT model to monthly streamflow simulation near the SRB outlet with a control section in Porto Real (drainage area of 45,042 km²), identified 11 sensitive parameters, of which seven are coincident with this study: ESCO, CN2, ALPHA_BF, CANMX, CH_N2, GW_REVAP, and CH_K2. Similar results were also found in Rodrigues et al (2021), which applied the SWAT model for the simulation of daily streamflow in Manuel Alves da Natividade River Basin (MRB) (drainage area of 14,344 km²), adjacent to the SRB. The authors identified 14 sensitive parameters, of which eleven are coincident with this study, and the GWQMN did not show sensitivity in the MRB.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rodrigues et al (2020), which applied the SWAT model to monthly streamflow simulation near the SRB outlet with a control section in Porto Real (drainage area of 45,042 km²), identified 11 sensitive parameters, of which seven are coincident with this study: ESCO, CN2, ALPHA_BF, CANMX, CH_N2, GW_REVAP, and CH_K2. Similar results were also found in Rodrigues et al (2021), which applied the SWAT model for the simulation of daily streamflow in Manuel Alves da Natividade River Basin (MRB) (drainage area of 14,344 km²), adjacent to the SRB. The authors identified 14 sensitive parameters, of which eleven are coincident with this study, and the GWQMN did not show sensitivity in the MRB.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Martins et al (2020) applied the SWAT model for monthly streamflow simulation in the Ribeirão do Pinhal watershed, Limeira -São Paulo, and obtained NSE of 0.64 and 0.58 and PBIAS of 15.2 and -2.8%, respectively, for calibration and validation periods. Rodrigues et al (2021) evaluated the performance of the SWAT model in daily streamflow simulation in the Manuel Alves da Natividade River Basin (MRB), adjacent to the SRB, and obtained NSE values of 0.67 and 0.61, respectively, for calibration and validation periods.…”
Section: Swat Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of adequate hydrological monitoring in this region has led to problems in the management of water resources, which may further compromise the sustainability of this important biome. Thus, improving the knowledge base on streamflow in the Cerrado biome is essential for water management in Brazil and for ensuring water security and economic development (Rodrigues et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good adherence of the forecasted hydrographs to those observed can be seen, mainly in the periods of streamflow recession. According to Rodrigues et al (2021), the best models for these periods should be based on the relationship between the groundwater flow, which is predominant in the recession periods, and the discharge from the aquifer. Peak flows were underestimated by the models, mainly due to the difficulty in capturing the many variables involved in the streamflow process, the difficult representation of the spatial variability of rainfall over the basin due to the low density of rain-gauge stations in the basins, and even errors from the extrapolation of the stage-curve of the river (Viola et al 2009;Silva Neto et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%