2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2022.103773
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological modeling using remote sensing precipitation data in a Brazilian savanna basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ten parameters were used in the SWAT calibration and validation with OP and CRU climatological data, selected based on previous studies in the PRB [56]. The final range and the best parameters obtained in the calibration (Table 3) agree with the result obtained by Junqueira et al [65] in the same basin using OP and observed climatological data from 2004 to 2018.…”
Section: Calibration Validation and Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ten parameters were used in the SWAT calibration and validation with OP and CRU climatological data, selected based on previous studies in the PRB [56]. The final range and the best parameters obtained in the calibration (Table 3) agree with the result obtained by Junqueira et al [65] in the same basin using OP and observed climatological data from 2004 to 2018.…”
Section: Calibration Validation and Uncertainty Analysissupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In this study, the calibration (2004-2011) was carried out with OP of four rain gauge stations from ANA (station codes 1545006, 1445000, 1545005, and 1544032) and CRU climate data, with the warm-up period from June 2000 to December 2003. The initial parameters were selected based on previous studies in the basin [56]. It used two iterations of 600 simulations each and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) as the objective function.…”
Section: Calibration Validation and Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was a considerable underestimation of rainfall estimated by the satellite identified across the Andes and coastal mountain areas lying at 36.5 degrees south, while the performance was better for northern and valley areas [20]. For the severe event that took place from 28-31 January 2021, Junqueira et al [25] showed that a correlation of 0.73 was achieved between the gridded IMERG Final product estimates and the gauge measurements. On the other hand, Soto Alvarez et al [15] analyzed the performance of IMERG Late and Final products for four different macro zones around Chile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, they showed a moderate correlation performance in Iran [21]. Other studies evaluated the different IMERG products in Iran [22], Finland [10], Greece [23], South America [24], Brazil [25][26][27], Saudi Arabia [19,28,29], Indonesia [30], Ecuador [31], Pakistan [32] and Chile [15,20,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent products that derive rainfall intensity information from meteorological satellite observations complement the in-situ data and are beginning to be used for several purposes, including, for example, the validation and intercomparison of satellite rainfall estimates [18], the analysis of flash floods [19,20], hydrological modeling [21,22,23,24,25], downscaling of rainfall extremes [26], and the estimation of IDF curves [27,28,29,30]. Among these products is the Integrated MultisatellitE Retrievals from GPM-IMERG (or in short IMERG) produced by NASA, a quasi-global dataset (60°N -60°S), calibrated using monthly rain gauge precipitation values, which provides rainfall intensities at 0.5 h intervals, with a spatial resolution of 0.1° (approximately 11 km at the equator).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%