Abstract. Temporal and spatial precipitation information is key to
conducting effective hydrological-process simulation and forecasting.
Herein, we implemented a comprehensive evaluation of three selected
precipitation products in the Jialing River watershed (JRW) located in
southwestern China. A number of indices were used to statistically analyze the
differences between two open-access precipitation products (OPPs), i.e.,
Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS) and
Climate Prediction Center Gauge-Based Analysis of Global Daily Precipitation (CPC), and the rain gauge (Gauge). The three products were then
categorized into subbasins to drive SWAT simulations. The results show the following. (1) The three products are highly consistent in temporal variation on a monthly
scale yet distinct on a daily scale. CHIRPS is characterized by
an overestimation of light rain, underestimation of heavy rain, and high
probability of false alarm. CPC generally underestimates rainfall of all
magnitudes. (2) Both OPPs satisfactorily reproduce the stream discharges at
the JRW outlet with slightly worse performance than the Gauge model. Model
with CHIRPS as inputs performed slightly better in both model simulation and
fairly better in uncertainty analysis than that of CPC. On a temporal scale,
the OPPs are inferior with respect to capturing flood peak yet superior at
describing other hydrograph features, e.g., rising and falling processes and
baseflow. On a spatial scale, CHIRPS offers the advantage of deriving
smooth, distributed precipitation and runoff due to its high resolution. (3) The water balance components derived from SWAT models with equal simulated
streamflow discharges are remarkably different between the three
precipitation inputs. The precipitation spatial pattern results in an
increasing surface flow trend from upstream to downstream. The results of
this study demonstrate that with similar performance in simulating
watershed runoff, the three precipitation datasets tend to conceal the
identified dissimilarities through hydrological-model parameter calibration,
which leads to different directions of hydrologic processes. As such,
multiple-objective calibration is recommended for large and spatially resolved
watersheds in future work. The main findings of this research suggest that
the features of OPPs facilitate the widespread use of CHIRPS in extreme
flood events and CPC in extreme drought analyses in future climate.