2017
DOI: 10.2166/wcc.2017.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological response to climate change of the Brahmaputra basin using CMIP5 general circulation model ensemble

Abstract: The Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna river system carries the world's third-largest fresh water discharge and Brahmaputra alone carries about 67% of the total annual flow of Bangladesh. Climate change will be expected to alter the hydrological cycles and the flow regime of these basins. Assessment of the fresh water availability of the Brahmaputra Basin in the future under climate change condition is crucial for both society and the ecosystem. SWAT, a semi-distributed physically based hydrological model, has been app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several applications of the SWAT model to specifically understand the hydrologic effects of surface depressions (e.g., Almendinger et al, 2011; Evenson et al, 2015, 2018; Liu et al, 2008; Rahman et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2008). SWAT has also been widely used for hydrological modeling in various geophysical settings worldwide, including major river basins in the United States (Rajib and Merwade, 2017), Europe (Abbaspour et al, 2015), Africa (Schuol et al, 2008) and Asia (Islam et al, 2017). Thus, findings from this study may be pertinent to worldwide SWAT model applications and at spatial scales much larger than the Pipestem Creek watershed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several applications of the SWAT model to specifically understand the hydrologic effects of surface depressions (e.g., Almendinger et al, 2011; Evenson et al, 2015, 2018; Liu et al, 2008; Rahman et al, 2016; Wang et al, 2008). SWAT has also been widely used for hydrological modeling in various geophysical settings worldwide, including major river basins in the United States (Rajib and Merwade, 2017), Europe (Abbaspour et al, 2015), Africa (Schuol et al, 2008) and Asia (Islam et al, 2017). Thus, findings from this study may be pertinent to worldwide SWAT model applications and at spatial scales much larger than the Pipestem Creek watershed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SWAT model is a physically based, comprehensive, continuous, semi-distributed and watershed-scale simulation model that can simulate most of the hydrological processes in watersheds (Arnold et al, 2012;Kavian et al, 2017;Islam et al, 2017). Primary input data for the SWAT model comprises land use data, a digital elevation map, a soil texture map and meteorological records.…”
Section: Description Of the Swat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal value for PBIAS is 0.0, that lowmagnitude values show precision simulation. Positive values and negative values in this criteria indicate overestimation and underestimation, respectively (Islam et al, 2017). The other used criteria for assessment the model performance is Dv criteria.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydrological models used in this study are commonly employed and were selected due to their widespread use in Iran and other countries (Taesombat and Sriwongsitanon, 2010;Tho et al, 2016;Islam et al, 2017). We selected simple watersheds in Iran with three different climates where running different models can give information about their performance in diverse regions of a country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%