2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological responses to land degradation in the Northwest Benin Owena River Basin, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is consensus regarding the responses of ET to ecological restoration, i.e., afforestation is generally effective in improving land surface greenness and simultaneously decreases water yields and increases ET at the watershed scale [16][17][18][19]. In contrast, vegetation degradation exerts the opposite effects and leads to decreased ET [20][21][22][23]; however, the consequences of the restoration on ET at regional scales and in large river basins are still contentious [18,24,25], because different land cover types have different biophysical effects due to different leaf area index (LAI), surface albedo, and root depth characteristics [16]. Moreover, stomatal responses to increased atmospheric CO 2 concentrations vary in vegetation species, which correspondingly have different evaporation rates [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is consensus regarding the responses of ET to ecological restoration, i.e., afforestation is generally effective in improving land surface greenness and simultaneously decreases water yields and increases ET at the watershed scale [16][17][18][19]. In contrast, vegetation degradation exerts the opposite effects and leads to decreased ET [20][21][22][23]; however, the consequences of the restoration on ET at regional scales and in large river basins are still contentious [18,24,25], because different land cover types have different biophysical effects due to different leaf area index (LAI), surface albedo, and root depth characteristics [16]. Moreover, stomatal responses to increased atmospheric CO 2 concentrations vary in vegetation species, which correspondingly have different evaporation rates [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, greening does not necessarily mean land improvement, as it can be caused by invasive plants encroachment and accompanying decreases in species richness and biodiversity (Admassie and Abebaw, 2020: Ethiopia case study). Major land use changes in the region since the 1970s included the rapid expansion of cropland areas and population settlements, and decreases in forests, grasslands, and water bodies (Hiernaux et al, 2009;Aladejana et al, 2018). Although there is considerable debate about the expansion of the Sahara Desert based on annual rainfall, Thomas and Nigam (2018) indicated that the Sahara expanded by 10% over the 20 th century (e.g., Osman and Mohamad, 2020: Sudan case study).…”
Section: Land Use and Land Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of human activities, such as land use change, LD can alter hydrological conditions that are crucial for water resources and sustainable river basin management (Aladejana et al 2018;Jiang et al 2019;Haghighi et al 2020). Therefore, efforts to prevent land degradation must be taken by agencies and governments worldwide (Keesstra et al 2016;Solomun et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatiotemporal patterns of land use change (anthropogenic factors) are the main factor in land degradation (Bewket and Sterk 2005;Gebremicael et al 2018). Other researchers have reported that direct anthropogenic disturbances in environments and ecosystems can increase land degradation (Ahiablame and Shakya 2016;Davudirad et al 2016;Aladejana et al 2018;Schwieger and Mbidzo 2020;Shao et al 2020). Jaquet et al (2015) found that outmigration has led to land degradation in a western Nepal watershed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%