1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-22018-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologie und Wasserwirtschaft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
8
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This ordered list was compared with the observed ordered list by dividing the latter into bins of size 0.6 standard deviations of the actual variable, calculating the averages obs i within each bin, and calculating the corresponding averages cal i of the generated list. The binning was required to keep the MRE value from being dominated entirely by the numerous small values in the generally strongly skewed distributions; 0.6 standard deviations is a recommended bin size (Maniak, 1993). MRE of each validation variable was calculated as (2) and to obtain an overall measure of the accuracy of a certain disaggregation experiment, MRE was averaged over all seven variables (Mn(MRE)).…”
Section: Fig 1(a) Typical Location Of Mean and Quantiles In An Ordementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ordered list was compared with the observed ordered list by dividing the latter into bins of size 0.6 standard deviations of the actual variable, calculating the averages obs i within each bin, and calculating the corresponding averages cal i of the generated list. The binning was required to keep the MRE value from being dominated entirely by the numerous small values in the generally strongly skewed distributions; 0.6 standard deviations is a recommended bin size (Maniak, 1993). MRE of each validation variable was calculated as (2) and to obtain an overall measure of the accuracy of a certain disaggregation experiment, MRE was averaged over all seven variables (Mn(MRE)).…”
Section: Fig 1(a) Typical Location Of Mean and Quantiles In An Ordementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the extrapolation is limited by the length of the simulated runoff time 5 series. As per Maniak (2005), a maximum return period of three times the runoff time series length should be used to avoid too high statistical uncertainties caused by extrapolation. This results in 75 years for Pionierbrücke, 21 years for Tetendorf and 45 years for Reckershausen.…”
Section: A) Hbv-simulation Results With Calibration Using Three Rain mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the maximum observed value of each half year were extracted from both data sources to generate periods as long as possible. 20001929-20061952-2005Tetendorf 20041986-20001986-2000Reckershausen 20041964-20061974-2005 …”
Section: Runoff Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods have a severe drawback. Counting the frequency of critical events is only reasonable if the length of the time series is at least three times longer than the considered return period (Maniak 1992), which is typically not available. Using a pre-defined probability distribution can lead to wrong extrapolations, especially for high return periods, if the theoretical distribution does not comply with the real distribution of the extremes data.…”
Section: Lammersenmentioning
confidence: 99%