2016
DOI: 10.1002/app.44674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrolytic degradation of biobased poly(butylene succinate‐co‐furandicarboxylate) and poly(butylene adipate‐co‐furandicarboxylate) copolyesters under mild conditions

Abstract: It is indispensable to investigate hydrolytic degradation behavior to develop novel (bio)degradable polyesters. Biobased and biodegradable copolyesters poly(butylene adipate-co-butylene furandicarboxylate) (PBAF) and poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene furandicarboxylate) (PBSF) with BF molar fraction (/ BF ) between 40 and 60% were synthesized in this study. The hydrolytic degradation of film samples was conducted in a pH 7.0 PBS buffer solution at 25 8C. Slight mass loss (1-2%) but significant decrease in in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the weight loss of PHF-1 (23.0 wt %) was higher than that of PHF-7 (20.9 wt %), and PHF-7 was higher that of PHF-6 (19.8 wt %). When compared with the FDCA-based polyesters that were reported in the published literature [ 47 ], the weight loss of PHFs was obviously higher than that of the reported results, which only were 1, 2, and 10 wt % in the fourth week and 2, 5, and 28 wt % in twenty-second week, respectively, under neutral, pH = 4.0 and pH = 12.0 conditions. It shows in Figure 7 a that the weight loss is not linearly related to acid treatment time, which may be due to the difference in crystalline and amorphous regions [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…As a result, the weight loss of PHF-1 (23.0 wt %) was higher than that of PHF-7 (20.9 wt %), and PHF-7 was higher that of PHF-6 (19.8 wt %). When compared with the FDCA-based polyesters that were reported in the published literature [ 47 ], the weight loss of PHFs was obviously higher than that of the reported results, which only were 1, 2, and 10 wt % in the fourth week and 2, 5, and 28 wt % in twenty-second week, respectively, under neutral, pH = 4.0 and pH = 12.0 conditions. It shows in Figure 7 a that the weight loss is not linearly related to acid treatment time, which may be due to the difference in crystalline and amorphous regions [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…PEF- co -PES copolymers exhibited weight loss in PhBS/lipase up to 12.5 wt % after 1 month [ 52 ] and PPF- co -PPS lost up to 35% of their mass after 1 month in similar conditions [ 62 ], which could be attributed to their amorphous character in contrast with PEF- co -PES, which possesses some crystallinity. PBF- co -PBS with PBF contents 40–60 mol% lost only 2% of their weight after 21 weeks in PhBS [ 75 ], 1% in acidic conditions, 52% in alkaline conditions, and 90% after 180 days in compost [ 74 ]. As degradation progressed, the percentage of crystallinity of the polymers increased.…”
Section: Biodegradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, some of the first efforts to prepare biodegradable and biobased copolymers with FDCA included adipic acid as a comonomer. Both PEF and PBF have been combined with PEAd and PBAd respectively, in an effort to determine the biodegradability in relation to the physical and mechanical properties [ 50 , 72 , 74 , 75 ]. In the study of Papadopoulos et al, the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of PEF- co -PEAd copolymers was affected more by the comonomer content, rather than crystallinity or Mw [ 50 ].…”
Section: Biodegradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations