1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf02927592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrolytic enzymes in aquaticHyphomycetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These media differ only slightly in nitrogen and free glucose content. MEB contains high levels of other carbohydrates (8) (e.g., maltose) not found in GMS-VAA that can be readily broken down to glucose by aquatic hyphomycetes (21). In particular, such breakdown by ␣-D-glucoside glucohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.20) would result in about fourfold-higher glucose levels in MEB than in GMS-VAA (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These media differ only slightly in nitrogen and free glucose content. MEB contains high levels of other carbohydrates (8) (e.g., maltose) not found in GMS-VAA that can be readily broken down to glucose by aquatic hyphomycetes (21). In particular, such breakdown by ␣-D-glucoside glucohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.20) would result in about fourfold-higher glucose levels in MEB than in GMS-VAA (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Establishing a direct connection between a species and its array of hydrolytic enzymes in aquatic hyphomycetes was pioneered by Suberkropp & Klug (1980), who demonstrated activity against cellulose, hemicelluloses and pectin in pure culture filtrates of five species. Activity against lignin or phenolics is generally weaker but fairly widespread in aquatic hyphomycetes (Suberkropp & Klug 1981;Chamier 1985;Zemek et al 1985;Abdel-Raheen & Ali 2004).…”
Section: Who Does What?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The identity of the dominant species was manipulated within each of 2 fungal communities known to colonize litter at different decomposition stages, to overcome the issue of assembling species randomly without taking into account natural co-occurrence. Given that (1) our assemblages include aquatic hyphomycete species that differ in their degradative capabilities (Zemek et al 1985) and (2) dominant species play an important role in driving ecosystem processes, differences in rates of leaf processing by fungal assemblages differing in their dominant species are anticipated. If these changes happen, then impacts on litter processing in fresh waters might occur well before there is species loss due to anthropogenic activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%