“…[12] STAM-17-OEt, like other MOFs,i sm icroporous,t hough has as urprisingly low surface area of 58 m 2 g À1 . [11] Thel ow porosity in STAM-17-OEt is due to its switchable structure, where upon activation the pores in STAM-17-OEt become constricted by the change in the coordination environment of the copper paddlewheels.T his constriction consequently impacts the porosity,t hough the low surface area observed for STAM-17-OEt is not representative of the materials overall gas adsorption capability.Asignificant drop in the porosity of the carbon upon incorporation of the MOF would provide further evidence that STAM-17-OEt is inside the carbon, due to partial pore-blocking by STAM-17-OEt crystals.T he surface areas of the composites do fall inbetween those of the MOF and carbon alone,w here the higher the MOF content, the lower the surface area (Table 1). Thegreatest loss of porosity is observed in the highest loading Dynamic vapour sorption (DVS) studies using either cyclohexane or water vapours were performed on the materials.C yclohexane is known to adsorb on the carbon but not the MOF (due to its relatively small pore size) and while water vapour adsorbs on both, the resulting isotherms are very different in shape.I ne ither case,p re-activated samples were exposed to increasing levels of relative pressure and the associated uptake was measured at each point.…”