“…Finally, in nonhydrolyzed vanadium complexes ( 2 – 4 ), ethyl maltol played a major role in easing the transport and absorption in the lipid layer leading to enhancement in the cytotoxicity results. ,,, Thus, complex 2 with maximum hydrolytic stability and hydrophobicity values manifested as the most cytotoxic compound of the series. ,, However, 1 with poor hydrophobicity and hydrolytic stability, which was expected to show the least toxicity, is the second most toxic compound of the series, which may be due to the mixture of active species generated in the incubation media, i.e., the vanadium-hydroxyl, ethyl maltol, and traces of dimeric vanadium, along with the intact species. ,,,,, In addition, the results of biomolecular (CT–DNA/BSA) interaction studies of the complexes have correlated well with the cytotoxicity. − 1 and 2 with maximum DNA/BSA binding capacity exhibited maximum cytotoxicity, whereas 3 stands as an exception, though it has high log P ow and t 1/2 results, which showed poor biomolecular interaction resulting in potentially low cytotoxicity. Overall, from these detailed discussions, it can be stated that to be established as a better anticancer agent, a compound should have good hydrolytic stability, effective membrane internalization, and strong biomolecular interactions. ,,,,, …”