2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry for the analysis of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
139
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
139
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For gaseous CWAs (blood agent), volatile CWAs (nerve gas, blister agent) and nonvolatile CWAs (lachrymators), the decontamination level can be estimated by qualitative and quantitative determination of the remaining CWAs and degradation products. The CWAs and volatile degradation products are analyzed by gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS), 10,70) and polar decomposition products are structurally analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)-MS. 71) The low MW biological toxins and the degradation products are analyzed by LC-MS, 72) and the toxin activity is measured by bioassay 73) or lateral flow immunoassay. 61) The proteinous toxins are analyzed quantitatively by spectroscopy (protein assay, organic materials index) and enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay, 74) and qualitatively by capillary electrophoresis, 75) gel electrophoresis, 76) surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectrometry, 77) LC-MS 78) and matrixassisted laser ionization MS. 75,76) The cytotoxic activity is measured by cell culture assay 79) and bioassay, 80) and the enzymatic activity is measured by colorimetric assay.…”
Section: Methods For Estimating Decontamination Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For gaseous CWAs (blood agent), volatile CWAs (nerve gas, blister agent) and nonvolatile CWAs (lachrymators), the decontamination level can be estimated by qualitative and quantitative determination of the remaining CWAs and degradation products. The CWAs and volatile degradation products are analyzed by gas chromatographymass spectrometry (GC-MS), 10,70) and polar decomposition products are structurally analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)-MS. 71) The low MW biological toxins and the degradation products are analyzed by LC-MS, 72) and the toxin activity is measured by bioassay 73) or lateral flow immunoassay. 61) The proteinous toxins are analyzed quantitatively by spectroscopy (protein assay, organic materials index) and enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay, 74) and qualitatively by capillary electrophoresis, 75) gel electrophoresis, 76) surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectrometry, 77) LC-MS 78) and matrixassisted laser ionization MS. 75,76) The cytotoxic activity is measured by cell culture assay 79) and bioassay, 80) and the enzymatic activity is measured by colorimetric assay.…”
Section: Methods For Estimating Decontamination Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another HPLC method frequently used is that developed by Oshima (1995) however three different analyses are required to identify the PST derivatives. In recent times LCͲMS/MS has emerged as a powerful tool for the analysis of PSTs (Jaime et al, 2001 andDell'Aversano et al, 2005). While these methods allow for the accurate determination of these toxins in phytoplankton, they are laboratory based requiring skilled technicians and expensive equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) is one of the most potentially useful methods for the identification and quantification of STX and PSTs. 2,6,[8][9][10][11] In terms of the analysis of STX, it is noteworthy that some of the LC/MS/MS methods have quantified STX in shellfish extract and human urine samples by using gonyautoxin 1 10 and 15 N7-isotopically labeled STX, 11 respectively, as an internal standard. Another instrumental method, high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescent detection (HPLC-FD), 12,13 has been used in the research field, and the applicability of this method as the official testing method for STX and other STX analogues in shellfish has been demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] A drawback in the instrumental methods is insufficient availability of STX and PSTs standards for the identification and quantification of toxins. Especially STX is listed as chemical warfare agents in schedule 1 in the chemical weapons convention (CWC), 7 and it is prohibited to produce, stockpile and utilize STX for any purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%