2020
DOI: 10.34117/bjdv6n7-849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobic Aggregation of Galena Fine Particles

Abstract: Hydrophobic aggregation of galena fine particles Agregação hidrofóbica de partículas finas de galena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…with the spiral concentrator, it should be noted that a concentrate having a particle size smaller than 106 µm suffered a sharp fall in the mass recovery rate (from 56.41% to 21.25%), which confirmed the negative effect of the particles rated as fine. Several authors highlight the difficulties in concentration ore fines, as cited by Subrahmanyam and Forssberg, 1990 and emphasized in research by Nogueira et al, 2020. Also, the fine particles (especially those smaller than 106 µm, which amounts to 50% of the metallic content of the feeding samples) (Figure 6), were dragged to the tailings by the water action.…”
Section: Effects Of Finesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…with the spiral concentrator, it should be noted that a concentrate having a particle size smaller than 106 µm suffered a sharp fall in the mass recovery rate (from 56.41% to 21.25%), which confirmed the negative effect of the particles rated as fine. Several authors highlight the difficulties in concentration ore fines, as cited by Subrahmanyam and Forssberg, 1990 and emphasized in research by Nogueira et al, 2020. Also, the fine particles (especially those smaller than 106 µm, which amounts to 50% of the metallic content of the feeding samples) (Figure 6), were dragged to the tailings by the water action.…”
Section: Effects Of Finesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Ein weiterer wichtiger Symptomkomplex, zu dessen Evidenz gerade ein systematischer Review vorgelegt wurde 32 , ist das Vorhandensein von Schmerzen bei Menschen mit Parkinson. Physiotherapeutisch bedeutend ist dabei die hohe Prävalenz von muskuloskelettalen Schmerzen, die vor allem in den Armen und Beinen angegeben werden und in den Schultern sowie im Bereich der zervikalen und lumbalen Wirbelsäule.…”
Section: Parkinson-syndromunclassified
“…Physiotherapeutisch bedeutend ist dabei die hohe Prävalenz von muskuloskelettalen Schmerzen, die vor allem in den Armen und Beinen angegeben werden und in den Schultern sowie im Bereich der zervikalen und lumbalen Wirbelsäule. Typische Parkinson-assoziierte Schmerzen sind nicht überraschend ebenfalls häufig und laut Review am zweithäufigsten vorhanden 32 – gemeint sind z. B. aus der motorischen Dysfunktion resultierende Schmerzen 33 .…”
Section: Parkinson-syndromunclassified