2002
DOI: 10.1039/b203773d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobic hydration and hydrophobic interaction in aqueous solutions of tert-butyl alcohol and trimethylamine-N-oxide: a correlation with the effect of these two solutes on the micellization process

Abstract: We report the study of the effect of tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) on a typical process governed by the hydrophobic interaction, such as the micellization of a surfactant in aqueous solution. The behaviour of the critical micelle concentration (c.m.c.) of the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was investigated as a function of the added amounts of TBA or TMAO by conductivity measurements. The hydration properties of the two solutes was studied by IR spectroscopy, in the region of the fre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
74
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
13
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 For TMAO samples, this band maintains the characteristic typical of a monomeric solute dispersion (no variation in frequency or in other parameters). 3 This result substantially agrees with the roughly linear trends in ∆ versus X 2 , as reported in Figures 6 and 7. In contrast, the CH stretching frequency in the TBA case is constant for X 2 < 0.025, decreases rapidly in the range of 0.025 < X 2 < 0.13, and for higher X 2 progressively saturates toward the pure-alcohol value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 For TMAO samples, this band maintains the characteristic typical of a monomeric solute dispersion (no variation in frequency or in other parameters). 3 This result substantially agrees with the roughly linear trends in ∆ versus X 2 , as reported in Figures 6 and 7. In contrast, the CH stretching frequency in the TBA case is constant for X 2 < 0.025, decreases rapidly in the range of 0.025 < X 2 < 0.13, and for higher X 2 progressively saturates toward the pure-alcohol value.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…40 For example, the critical micelle concentration (cmc) of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in the presence of TBA decreases at low alcohol mole fractions and increases at high alcohol concentrations, passing through a minimum at X 2 ≈ 0.025, where the hydrophobic clustering of TBA molecules starts. 3 Furthermore, in the same concentration range where the cmc and thus the free energy of micellization show a minimum, a maximum is observed for the transition enthalpy and entropy in the case of lysozyme thermal denaturation in H 2 O/TBA mixtures. 21 Thus, the stabilization of both the protein and the micellar structures in the H 2 O/TBA mixtures appears to be closely linked to the properties and the anomalous behavior of the mixed solvent.…”
Section: From Eqs 3 and 4 One Obtainsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In particular, the latter exhibits a rather steep decrease in the 0.02-0.03 solute molar fraction range, that is in the same concentration range where remarkable changes in a number of physical properties have been experimentally shown to occur for aqueous solutions of TBA but not for those of TMAO. 10 These experimental findings were interpreted as indicating that in the above concentration range TBA starts to self-aggregate while TMAO apparently does not selfaggregate up to the highest concentration considered (i.e., X 2 ¼ 0.05). 9 Moreover, analogous data for aqueous solutions of GB represented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no clear mechanism for the conjectured osmolyte activity with the backbone has been devised. Recent work has argued that the presence of osmolyte alters protein stability indirectly by affecting the water structure,23–25 whereas a case has been made that it is the direct interaction, or lack of, between the osmolyte and backbone that causes the osmolyte effect 26–28…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%