2015
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobic Interactions Are Key To Drive the Association of Tapasin with Peptide Transporter Subunit TAP2

Abstract: The transporter associated with Ag processing (TAP) translocates proteasomally derived cytosolic peptides into the endoplasmic reticulum. TAP is a central component of the peptide-loading complex (PLC), to which tapasin (TPN) recruits MHC class I (MHC I) and accessory chaperones. The PLC functions to facilitate and optimize MHC I–mediated Ag presentation. The heterodimeric peptide transporter consists of two homologous subunits, TAP1 and TAP2, each of which contains an N-terminal domain (N-domain) in addition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it seems plausible that tapasin and TAPBPR have evolved to function in distinct cellular environments. For tapasin, three regions have been identified that are essential for its localisation and function within the PLC: its transmembrane domain is responsible for its interaction with TAP (Petersen et al, 2005; Rufer et al, 2015); a free cysteine residue at position C95 is essential for its association with ERp57 (Dick et al, 2002; Peaper et al, 2005); and residues in the Ig domains interact with MHC class I (Turnquist et al, 2001; Turnquist et al, 2004, Dong et al, 2009). For TAPBPR, the only functional sites to be identified so far are those that are responsible for its interaction with MHC class I (Hermann et al, 2013), and as yet, no association partners that function with TAPBPR have been characterised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it seems plausible that tapasin and TAPBPR have evolved to function in distinct cellular environments. For tapasin, three regions have been identified that are essential for its localisation and function within the PLC: its transmembrane domain is responsible for its interaction with TAP (Petersen et al, 2005; Rufer et al, 2015); a free cysteine residue at position C95 is essential for its association with ERp57 (Dick et al, 2002; Peaper et al, 2005); and residues in the Ig domains interact with MHC class I (Turnquist et al, 2001; Turnquist et al, 2004, Dong et al, 2009). For TAPBPR, the only functional sites to be identified so far are those that are responsible for its interaction with MHC class I (Hermann et al, 2013), and as yet, no association partners that function with TAPBPR have been characterised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rat TAP, however, this conserved aspartate in TAP2 can be exchanged to alanine without an effect on tapasin binding. In this case, leucine-rich areas in TM1 and TM2 of TAP2 seem to be important for tapasin binding (Rufer et al, 2015 ). Interestingly, tapasin interacts also with core TM9 of unassembled TAP1 which facilitates transporter stability and heterodimerization (Leonhardt et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Domain Organization Of Tap-related Transportersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a key component of the PLC, tapasin makes a number of essential contacts with the TAP transporters [1][2][3]32,33], ERp57 [34,35] and of course MHC class I (Figure 1). In contrast, our current, over-simplified model of TAPBPR is one in which it performs peptide-editing on MHC class I in isolation, without any additional co-factors (Figure 1).…”
Section: Differences In Co-factors That Tapasin and Tapbpr Associate mentioning
confidence: 99%