Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is a promising hydrophobic, CO 2 -selective solvent for the absorption of CO 2 from a hot or warm water-rich, H 2 -rich, postwater−gas shift reactor (WGSR) stream in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. In this work, there are three hydrophobic silicones that are more thermally stable than PDMS, including an iron-stabilized PDMS (PDMS-Fe), poly(dimethyl-co-methylphenyl)siloxane (PDMMPS), and poly(dimethyl-co-diphenyl)-siloxane (PDMDPS). PDMDPS is an extremely poor CO 2 solvent, which is undesirable for the proposed separation, and a poor hydrogen solvent, which is a desirable trait. PDMDPS and PDMMPS absorb about the same amount of H 2 . Although PDMMPS is a much better CO 2 solvent than PDMDPS, PDMMPS is a slightly poorer CO 2 solvent than PDMS or PDMS-Fe. PDMS-Fe and PDMS are comparable hydrophobic solvents that exhibit the greatest solvent strength for CO 2 ; however, PDMS-Fe and PDMS absorb slightly more hydrogen than PDMDPS and PDMMPS. If the absorption/regeneration process is designed such that the solvent is exposed to temperatures no greater than 230°C, PDMS is recommended due to its low cost. For higher temperatures, the extremely low solubility of CO 2 in PDMDPS precludes its use as a CO 2 -selective solvent. The ferrosilicone additive in PDMS-Fe is designed to inhibit polymer degradation in an oxidizing environment, but it offers no additional stability in the oxygen-free closed system associated with the IGCC. PDMMPS absorbs less H 2 than PDMS or PDMS-Fe but is a slightly poorer CO 2 solvent than PDMS or PDMS-Fe. However, PDMMPS is thermally stable in closed systems to 300°C. Therefore, PDMMPS is recommended for prolonged high temperature use as the precombustion carbon capture absorber solvent at absorption/regeneration temperatures above 230°C. Although these hydrophobic silicones exhibit promising attributes for a warm or hot precombustion carbon capture process, the diminishing CO 2 solubility and increasing CO 2 solubility that occur with increasing temperature will challenge the economic viability of this proposed CO 2 -selective absorption process.
■ INTRODUCTIONChemical and physical absorption methods are typically used for the postcombustion and precombustion capture of CO 2 , respectively. 1 At low CO 2 partial pressures of ∼0.010−0.015 MPa associated with postcombustion capture of CO 2 from flue gas, amine solutions are favored because they will react with dilute concentrations of CO 2 to attain significant loadings. A 30 wt % solution of monoethanolamine (MEA) in water, for example, will bind CO 2 as a water-soluble ammonium carbamate at a 2:1 molar ratio of MEA:CO 2 , enabling this solution to absorb about 11 wt % CO 2 . CO 2 release and solvent regeneration is accomplished via heating. 1,2 Precombustion capture of CO 2 is typically accomplished with physical solvents, however, because the high CO 2 partial pressure in the post water−gas shift reactor (WGSR) gas stream is sufficient to cause the dissolution of significant amounts of CO ...