2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.10.11.463886
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobicity in clearwing Lepidoptera: impact of scale micro and nanostructure, and trade-off with optical transparency

Abstract: In opaque butterflies and moths, scales ensure vital functions like camouflage, thermoregulation, and hydrophobicity. Wing transparency in some species - achieved via modified or absent scales - raises the question of whether hydrophobicity can be maintained and of it dependence on scale microstructural (scale presence, morphology, insertion angle, and coloration) and nanostructural (ridge spacing and width) features. To address these questions, we assessed hydrophobicity in 23 clearwing species differing in s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An ultimate, adaptive hypothesis would be that retaining scales in transparent wing regions aids in generating structural colours [ 12 ], self-cleaning [ 65 ], aerodynamics [ 66 ] and thermoregulation [ 67 ]. Here, we demonstrate that the upright scales of the transparent regions in P. vitreus confer increased hydrophobicity to the wing, a function that might be generalized to most clearwing butterflies and moths [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ultimate, adaptive hypothesis would be that retaining scales in transparent wing regions aids in generating structural colours [ 12 ], self-cleaning [ 65 ], aerodynamics [ 66 ] and thermoregulation [ 67 ]. Here, we demonstrate that the upright scales of the transparent regions in P. vitreus confer increased hydrophobicity to the wing, a function that might be generalized to most clearwing butterflies and moths [ 68 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%