2016
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2016.1160812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobicity of fluorocarbon-finished electrospun poly (acrylonitrile) nanofibrous webs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that it was very important how the geometry of electrospun surfaces was validated. The commonly used fiber diameter was not necessarily a convincing parameter unless it was correlated with surface roughness [7,46,50,51,69]. Another important parameter that should be included in the roughness analysis of electrospun surfaces was a fraction of fibers that was strictly correlated with changes of surface free energies of 3D meshes, which was reduced by the air trapped between fibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that it was very important how the geometry of electrospun surfaces was validated. The commonly used fiber diameter was not necessarily a convincing parameter unless it was correlated with surface roughness [7,46,50,51,69]. Another important parameter that should be included in the roughness analysis of electrospun surfaces was a fraction of fibers that was strictly correlated with changes of surface free energies of 3D meshes, which was reduced by the air trapped between fibers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, many studies have shown the effect of increased contact angles, most often for water, for the decreased fiber diameter [7,46], however, the smallest fibers were often with beads and the variations of contact angles were smaller than 10° for the sizes from 0.6 to 2.2 µm [46] and between 3.5 to 8 µm another 10° [7]. Other studies actually showed the opposite, so an increase of contact angle with fibers diameter [50] or no correlation at all with D f [51]. Based on the above-mentioned studies, we tried to identify the range of fiber diameter that should not influence wetting contact angle, so we could focus in our investigation on roughness and fraction of fibers effect on wetting of polymer meshes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation is that the electrospun matrix’s wettability is influenced not only by polymer type but also by fibre distribution and their diameter. In the literature, as reported by Sadeghi P. and coworkers, an increase in contact angle values was related to greater fibre diameter [ 53 ]. If the average fibre diameters ± standard deviation of ES2 (1.085 ± 0.360 μm) and ES3 (1.076 ± 0.537 μm) samples were compared, a slight increase in fibre size for less wettable ES3 was reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Some of the previous studies in the field [ 82 , 83 ] have shown that small diameters of fibers will determine high values for their contact angles, while others [ 83 ] have demonstrated the opposite effect, namely an increase in the contact angle with fiber diameters. As can be seen from the SEM images ( Figure 6 ), in our case, for the fibrous membranes obtained from the polymer solutions in DMF (PSFQ and CAP), the contact angle values are slightly lower compared to those corresponding to the membrane obtained from the PVDF solution in NMP, which means that they are slightly hydrophilic, and the diameter of the fibers differs insignificantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%