2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydropower development in the Republic of Georgia and implications for freshwater biodiversity conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biodiversity hotspots are, therefore, in urgent need of protection. These energy systems that share their catchment areas with biodiversity hotspots require a deeper understanding of the livelihood options of the surrounding communities concerning watershed management and biodiversity conservation (Japoshvili et al, 2021).…”
Section: Biodiversity Hotspots Within Energy Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biodiversity hotspots are, therefore, in urgent need of protection. These energy systems that share their catchment areas with biodiversity hotspots require a deeper understanding of the livelihood options of the surrounding communities concerning watershed management and biodiversity conservation (Japoshvili et al, 2021).…”
Section: Biodiversity Hotspots Within Energy Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land use changes, alteration in freshwater habitat, and in water quality have been identified as the main causeeffect pathways describing the impact of hydropower on biodiversity (Gracey and Verones 2016). Although the impact of hydropower on terrestrial ecosystems can be major (e.g., Pandit and Grumbine 2012;Jones et al 2016) and does not necessarily correlate with impacts on aquatic ecosystems (Dorber et al 2020), a larger proportion of literature focuses on freshwater ecosystems (Winemiller et al 2016;Ashraf et al 2018;Zarfl et al 2019;Japoshvili et al 2021), and in particular on mitigation measures for salmonids, including fish ramps (Haraldstad et al 2019) or adjustments in minimum flow requirements (Poff et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The South Caucasus is widely recognised as a biodiversity hotspot characterised by a great diversity of landscapes and climate zones that shelter a highly diverse plant and animal biota. Freshwater biodiversity is the most understudied ecological aspect of the South Caucasus (Mumladze et al 2020), whose watercourses are exploited for hydropower production (Japoshvili et al 2021) and secondarily for drinking water uptake, fisheries, irrigation and recreational activities. However, the potential threats faced by the freshwater biodiversity and ecosystems of the South Caucasus have not yet been evaluated, hence remain overall poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the potential threats faced by the freshwater biodiversity and ecosystems of the South Caucasus have not yet been evaluated, hence remain overall poorly understood. Only in a recent study have the effects of existing and planned hydropower plants on the connectivity of fish communities in Georgia been investigated in some detail (Japoshvili et al 2021). Additionally, in another recent study, an attempt has been made to summarise the diversity, distribution and introduction history of non-native fishes in the South Caucasus based on a literature review and social-media data (Kuljanishvili et al 2021b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%