1975
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(75)90323-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrostatic pressure effect on surface photovoltage of GaAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because as the free carriers are generated closer to the surface, surface recombination becomes more dominant, the net excess carrier density is diminished, and the resulting SPV signal is decreased. Accordingly, SPV versus photon energy spectra have been observed to change from monotonically increasing to displaying a maximum upon, e.g., hydrostatic pressure which increased the SRV [327], or background white light which reduced the barrier height [325]. A very pronounced peak is found in the SPV spectrum corresponding to the MOCVD-grown CdTe sample in Fig.…”
Section: Bandgap Energy and Semiconductor Typementioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is because as the free carriers are generated closer to the surface, surface recombination becomes more dominant, the net excess carrier density is diminished, and the resulting SPV signal is decreased. Accordingly, SPV versus photon energy spectra have been observed to change from monotonically increasing to displaying a maximum upon, e.g., hydrostatic pressure which increased the SRV [327], or background white light which reduced the barrier height [325]. A very pronounced peak is found in the SPV spectrum corresponding to the MOCVD-grown CdTe sample in Fig.…”
Section: Bandgap Energy and Semiconductor Typementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Due to the near-E g parasitic mechanisms, it is very seldom the case that a relatively accurate value of E g can be obtained from the ®gure simply by inspection [327]. In fact, we are aware of only one such case [328].…”
Section: Bandgap Energy and Semiconductor Typementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The direction of this transition agrees with the n-type conductivity of the sample. 29 A more moderate decrease in the CPD follows this point, which can be explained by the interplay between the increase of the DOS, as states deeper in the conduction and valence bands are made available by the increasing photon energies, and the relaxation of deep levels as the absorption depth decreases. At ϳ1.7 eV, the CPD changes from negative to positive slope ͑arrow 2͒.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%