2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx064
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrostratigraphy characterization of the Floridan aquifer system using ambient seismic noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the highest frequencies will be most sensitive to the shallow active layer. High frequencies (>1 Hz) have been used successfully in previous near-surface applications by using waves generated from natural and anthropogenic sources [Halliday et al, 2008;Picozzi et al, 2009;James et al, 2017]. Frequencies >30 Hz were poorly recovered in this study, with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) close to one ( Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In other words, the highest frequencies will be most sensitive to the shallow active layer. High frequencies (>1 Hz) have been used successfully in previous near-surface applications by using waves generated from natural and anthropogenic sources [Halliday et al, 2008;Picozzi et al, 2009;James et al, 2017]. Frequencies >30 Hz were poorly recovered in this study, with signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) close to one ( Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While the focus of our study was the specific utilization of installed telecom fiber probed by DAS for seismic sensing, our static imaging and monitoring results are consistent with and rely on broad advances in the field of ambient noise seismology applied to the near-surface. Beyond the foundational studies cited previously 38 , a variety of recent projects have utilized ambient noise approaches to probe hydrologic cycles 7,59–61 and aquifer structure 62 although typically using a sparse network of stations. Such studies have typically relied on the microseisms band as a noise source (0.1–1 Hz) and hence are observing averaged velocity perturbations over significant vertical extent, often to km depths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been fewer attempts to measure velocity profiles from EGFs using short ( T < 1 s) and intermediate (1 s < T < 3 s) wave periods to identify shallow crustal and sedimentary structures (Chávez‐García & Luzón, 2005; James et al., 2017; Pilz et al., 2012; Savage et al., 2013). In the use of short‐period waves, it is important to establish a reliable criterion in selecting the randomized noise because reconstruction of velocity profiles that relies on the scattered wave energy at depths may incorporate biases from uneven distribution of wave sources (Poli et al., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%